Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Often, extra credit home work DD/DS does reflects well in GBRS. But some kids have busy practicing sessions with sports, music or other activities, they may not have time to do EC home work
But that inability to find extra time to do extra credit homework could be indicative of future problems with a potentially increased workload...
Increased work load is quite different from high ability to absorb complicated material
The GBRSw/C is a record of observable classroom behaviors. It is not a recommendation or favorable support for or against full-time AAP placement or for other advanced academic services.
The local school screening committee consists of at least three of the following: a teacher who works with the student, the advanced academic resource teacher, an administrator, English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) teacher, and other specialists as needed. The local school committee completes the GBRSw/C and prepares screening files for all second grade pool candidates, as well as referrals.
Just some information from the FCPS parent AAP info package. The GBRS has input from at least three staff members.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, and that is why the GBRS is filled out by a team of educators and not just by one person. As part of the application package, it helps to provide a more complete picture of a child, beyond simple test scores. It gives the committee a "look" at the individual child in class during the school day. The parent can provide similar information about the child at home with the parent questionnaire.
Anonymous wrote:
But, they remain eminently more qualified than you. You're viewing your child through a parent lense. They're viewing your child with more detachment. They also have formal education and experience and the ability to make relative comparisons to a broader range of children. Or, more simply, you bring biases, they don't. So, again, their input and evaluation of your child is more valuable than your own.
All but the very newest teachers have seen many, many children in the classroom setting and over longer spans of time. They may not be perfect (who is?), but they bring their background and experience to the table when observing the students in their classes. Their perspectives are a valuable addition to the screening process.
But, they remain eminently more qualified than you. You're viewing your child through a parent lense. They're viewing your child with more detachment. They also have formal education and experience and the ability to make relative comparisons to a broader range of children. Or, more simply, you bring biases, they don't. So, again, their input and evaluation of your child is more valuable than your own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Often, extra credit home work DD/DS does reflects well in GBRS. But some kids have busy practicing sessions with sports, music or other activities, they may not have time to do EC home work
But that inability to find extra time to do extra credit homework could be indicative of future problems with a potentially increased workload...
Anonymous wrote:GBRS is very subjective. If a child is doing well in school and gets good score in both (NNAT and Coget), however gets low GBRS, its questionable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Often, extra credit home work DD/DS does reflects well in GBRS. But some kids have busy practicing sessions with sports, music or other activities, they may not have time to do EC home work
But that inability to find extra time to do extra credit homework could be indicative of future problems with a potentially increased workload...
Anonymous wrote:Often, extra credit home work DD/DS does reflects well in GBRS. But some kids have busy practicing sessions with sports, music or other activities, they may not have time to do EC home work
Anonymous wrote:If the GBRS is consistent with what the teacher says in the conferences, no.
If what the teacher says to the bureaucracy is different than what he/she says face-to-face, well, yes.