Anonymous wrote:What about the OBs at GW? I know most are highly regarded and supportive of natural birth. Are they also great surgeons? Any doctor in particular that has a reputation for being a skilled surgeon?
Anonymous wrote:What about the OBs at GW? I know most are highly regarded and supportive of natural birth. Are they also great surgeons? Any doctor in particular that has a reputation for being a skilled surgeon?
Anonymous wrote:I'd be leery of having a c-section at WHC. The OB doctors that practice out of there are generally quite good, but they have some ongoing serious issues with nurse staffing. Considering the nurses are the ones providing the majority of care outside of the surgery itself, they are chronically understaffed and have had some high-profile "oopsies", it is something to think seriously about.
Anonymous wrote:I thought I had a great csection. Mine was an emergency, my doctor was quick, thorough, friendly, calming, my daughter was born healthy.
I have barely any scar (seriously, you can't even see it) - I was off the pain meds almost within hours and I was home in 3 days and up making breakfast the next morning.
She is a terrible OB and I stopped seeing her as doctor, but she is a kick ass surgeon - and let's face it - when someone is cutting you open and pulling out your baby, you want a good surgeon not a friendly personality.
Dr Salgado at PFW in Alexandria.
Anonymous wrote:What defines "the best c section?"
Is it just the size of the scar? Lots of things might affect that. And presumably the health of mother and child are more important.
Speed? Precision? Bedside manner? Ambiance? Do tell. Then maybe some of us can help you.