Anonymous wrote:Many of the above mentioned schools are not K-8, like Norwood...
Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately there are several area of weakness in the Middle school. I will not comment on teachers because that seems like it could become very personal very quickly.
Math. One outstanding teacher. The rest average or less so.
Science: ???
English: fairly strong but somewhat dependent on learning style
One of the problems is the lack of study skills and organization skills. Presently not taught in any systematic way.
If you have a kid that can figure out the organizational piece on their own you might be pretty happy.
Which is why some parents are very happy and some are less so.
Anonymous wrote:We came to Norwood LS from a different school last year and each year our child has about 9 teachers (hr, reading, math, science, spanish, art, music, PE, Library) - with overlap for some of the 'specials' subjects it's been maybe 15 total over 2 yrs. Out of that I would say 1 was bad - and the other 14 were fabulous. That one was frustrating - really frustrating - but honestly, it seems like pretty good odds to me. There are always some bad apples - or - even if not a bad apple - some tacher that is just 'not a good match' for your child. Just hope with new LS the troubling teacher is held accountable....
Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately there are several area of weakness in the Middle school. I will not comment on teachers because that seems like it could become very personal very quickly.
Math. One outstanding teacher. The rest average or less so.
Science: ???
English: fairly strong but somewhat dependent on learning style
One of the problems is the lack of study skills and organization skills. Presently not taught in any systematic way.
If you have a kid that can figure out the organizational piece on their own you might be pretty happy.
Which is why some parents are very happy and some are less so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not to hijack, but I have seen many posts about weak teachers in the lower school. Is it really that bad in the lower school?
We are currently an applying family.
Would love more details from OP as to why the teachers are perceived to be weak. Many thanks.
I have two children who have been in LS since kindergarten, and their teachers have been wonderful. My kids have formed close bonds with all of their homeroom teachers; they have been challenged to take greater risks; they feel safe and supported; and they love school. There have been many changes at the school since we've been there, but they've rolled with them. I feel comfortable that my children will be academically prepared for any high school environment, and equally important, I appreciate the benefits they derive from the school's investment in the arts, PE, and character education. No school is perfect, and as anywhere, there are stronger and weaker teachers at Norwood. However, we have been very satisfied with our children's experience.
Anonymous wrote:The Norwood posters appear to have a "Princess and the Pea" quality -- hyper-sensitive to everything. Older teachers are tired, newer teachers don't know what they are doing, appears to be the mantra. The only real negative about Norwood coming through on this board is the parent body. Fortunately, this is probably a DCUM phenomenon where the 3% annoying crowd drowns out the perfectly pleasant 97%.