Anonymous wrote:what does rpl mean? new to forums and not familiar with all the acronyms. thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:thanks everyone. i'm not sure if it's bad eggs or bad luck. probably bad eggs. the pregnancy that got the furtherest (on blood thinners and progesterone) tested positive for downs and then died. i know i'm taking a risk. i did ncivf this last time and we're paying for everything out of pocket. my doc said roll the dice on the genes b/c the cost of pgd high for ncivf (horrible on hormones which is why i've gone that route). i told myself this last time was last try b/c this sucks. that's why i wondered if ri worth exploring. would like answers before i decide if this is *really* my last try. first 4 were natural. last 2 iui's. then negative ivf. maybe it's just not in my future. regardless, you've given me a lot to consider and i appreciate it.
6:55 again. My doctor told me something similar in the beginning. And it is true that it is more cost effective to keeping getting pg and miscarrying than it is to shell out $5000 for PGD. But, seriously, how many miscarriages are you expected to endure??? Honestly, this advice is so infuriating. The psychological consequences of enduring multiple miscarriages are very serious side effects and it makes me so mad that doctors treat that so lightly. More than worth it to avoid them if at all possible. I cannot tell you the peace I found after I saw those PGD results. It's going to take us two more years to pay for that round but it's worth very penny.
And btw, there should be no difference for PGD between medicated and unmedicated cycles. The embryos are tested on day 5 after retrieval and fertilization. You are pretty much out of it at that point. Not sure why it should matter if ncivf or not. Do they not do 5-day transfers with ncivf or something? Are you in the DC area? Can you do a consult at GW? GW does PGD and they also do ncivf. Ask them if they can do both together.
Anonymous wrote:thanks everyone. i'm not sure if it's bad eggs or bad luck. probably bad eggs. the pregnancy that got the furtherest (on blood thinners and progesterone) tested positive for downs and then died. i know i'm taking a risk. i did ncivf this last time and we're paying for everything out of pocket. my doc said roll the dice on the genes b/c the cost of pgd high for ncivf (horrible on hormones which is why i've gone that route). i told myself this last time was last try b/c this sucks. that's why i wondered if ri worth exploring. would like answers before i decide if this is *really* my last try. first 4 were natural. last 2 iui's. then negative ivf. maybe it's just not in my future. regardless, you've given me a lot to consider and i appreciate it.
Anonymous wrote:I agree with 8:55 just because a doctor doesn't believe in it doesn't mean it doesn't work. It must be that they believe in certain aspects of reproductive immunology but not others. I don't think there are a lot of REs out there who would not put someone on blood thinners if they test positive for APS, which is autoimmune.
Give it 20 years, using treatments like G-CSF for thin lining and RPL will become mainstream. By then we will also know the conditions it treats so other doctors can run the same tests that only RIs run now. At that point some REs will eventually have to face that they were wrong and there was a lot of women they didn't help because they made a choice to exclude it in their treatment.
I'm not saying it's what everyone needs, but my DD would not be here without doctors out there like Braverman who continue to do research and push the field beyond where it would be otherwise.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I'm a bit like you. Had 5 m/cs, all before age of 35, and have MTHFR variation. Also was lucky enough to have one healthy pregnancy in there, so I have that to be thankful for. WHen I asked my OB if I should go down the immunology path, he strongly advised against it, and actually said it was a fraud and gave women false hope. This guy has decades of experience and isn't adverse to other specialists; we've talked about PGD as my next option.
Anyhow, if you're thinking about where the best value for your budget it, my dr's rec was PGD over immunology.