Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We were mystified by a discrepancy in DS's CogAT scores and had a WISC-IV done just to see if there were any clues there. The psychologist who did the WISC said his low verbal score on the CogAT (45th percentile) didn't make sense compared to his VCI on the WISC (95th percentile).
I know it's a different publisher, but NYC just had a furor over scoring errors on one of their standardized tests - http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/20/education/score-corrections-qualify-nearly-2700-more-pupils-for-gifted-programs.html?_r=0
Considering that this is the first year FCPS has used the customized version of the CogAT, does anyone think these large points discrepancies could be due to scoring errors? Have there been such wide variations in prior years using the old test? Just curious.
Yes, scores this year of the customized fairfax cogat was not even age normalized !!! So an 8 year old who turned 8 on Oct 1st is scored the same as the 7 year old who turned 7 on Sept 28 because they are in the same grade. The NYC parents and NYC school board is upset that the scoring did not base it to the DAY to be precise!!!!
Anonymous wrote:We were mystified by a discrepancy in DS's CogAT scores and had a WISC-IV done just to see if there were any clues there. The psychologist who did the WISC said his low verbal score on the CogAT (45th percentile) didn't make sense compared to his VCI on the WISC (95th percentile).
I know it's a different publisher, but NYC just had a furor over scoring errors on one of their standardized tests - http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/20/education/score-corrections-qualify-nearly-2700-more-pupils-for-gifted-programs.html?_r=0
Considering that this is the first year FCPS has used the customized version of the CogAT, does anyone think these large points discrepancies could be due to scoring errors? Have there been such wide variations in prior years using the old test? Just curious.
Anonymous wrote:We were mystified by a discrepancy in DS's CogAT scores and had a WISC-IV done just to see if there were any clues there. The psychologist who did the WISC said his low verbal score on the CogAT (45th percentile) didn't make sense compared to his VCI on the WISC (95th percentile).
I know it's a different publisher, but NYC just had a furor over scoring errors on one of their standardized tests - http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/20/education/score-corrections-qualify-nearly-2700-more-pupils-for-gifted-programs.html?_r=0
Considering that this is the first year FCPS has used the customized version of the CogAT, does anyone think these large points discrepancies could be due to scoring errors? Have there been such wide variations in prior years using the old test? Just curious.
Anonymous wrote:DYSLEXIA! At least that we are pretty sure our daughter has. She scored 98 Verbal.... but only 17 in non verbal.
School says as long as she is doing well, they won't help. We are going to have her privately tested. And even then, I don't think they will do anything... because her performance is at or above grade level. So that likely means private tutoring. I better go plant a money tree in the back yard, cause I'm gonna need it!!
Anonymous wrote:Possibly. You will want to have it checked out.
Anonymous wrote:i have the same thing happen to my son who is 10. He scored 97 in quantitative ,65 in non verbal and 43 in verbal.is is normal the school is no help..Anonymous wrote:Does a big difference in the Verbal vs Nonverbal marks in the CogAt mean anything is going on with the child learning wise? My child had an over 50 point difference between the two.[/quotes
Anonymous wrote:Does a big difference in the Verbal vs Nonverbal marks in the CogAt mean anything is going on with the child learning wise? My child had an over 50 point difference between the two.[/quotes
Anonymous wrote:This is a similar situation to our daughter's scores. She got a 91 on verbal and 42 quantitative, 45 nonquantitative. Such a huge inconsistency makes us wonder if there's something going on processing-wise or some other issue-wise. We're suspecting it in her everyday work too.
Problem is it's not severe enough to trigger testing by the school.
So then where do we go to figure out what's going on? I hate the thought of not getting her intervention if there really is something going on.
Anonymous wrote:Thanks. Unfortunately, we didn't receive enough info this year to input into that site to get the profile. And we can't use the percentiles given to us because they're based on FCPS not national data. We didn't get a stanine or any raw scores, just the FCPS percentiles.