Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they spend a lot of time on fit - take two children with similar profiles on paper - they might feel that they can serve one but not the other. When we interviewed, I was really impressed that they take a lot of time to assess whether the child will benefit from the McLean approach, and they really looked at DC as an individual, not a set of test scores. DC doesn't have particular learning issues, but would very definitely benefit from the McLean approach, individualized attention and smaller classes. We're very impressed.
If you look at the description from the search company for the new head, you'll see that they really want to make an effort going forward to be identified as a main stream school with a good support system. I'm sure they'll succeed. We really liked the model.
So how is this different than schools like:
St. Andrew's
Bullis
Field
Edmund Burke
St. John's
Good Counsel
Sandy Spring
Holy Child
All these schools offer the same approach. Good Counsel and st. John's offer specific programs for kids with learning issues. Mclean's niche is not really a niche anymore. Many schools offer small classes, individual attention to mild learning issues, accommodations such as extra time on tests or using a computer for notes. Schools like Bullis have added a learning center to help kids the extra help needed to be successful in school. There is much more recognition in the mainstream private school community of kids who have these needs.
In addition, the level of extra's many of these schools can provide mclean can't compete with especially if you have a kid who is really athletic or wants more of a social life.
mclean doesn't want kids with serious learning or behavioral issues so schools like Diener, Maddux, Auburn and Siena have filled that void.
Anonymous wrote:I think they spend a lot of time on fit - take two children with similar profiles on paper - they might feel that they can serve one but not the other. When we interviewed, I was really impressed that they take a lot of time to assess whether the child will benefit from the McLean approach, and they really looked at DC as an individual, not a set of test scores. DC doesn't have particular learning issues, but would very definitely benefit from the McLean approach, individualized attention and smaller classes. We're very impressed.
If you look at the description from the search company for the new head, you'll see that they really want to make an effort going forward to be identified as a main stream school with a good support system. I'm sure they'll succeed. We really liked the model.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The website seems clear that mcLean uses various methods and modalities to teach children with different learning styles. And, the testimonials at the open houses and information sessions make it pretty clear as well. So, I can't imagine who would feel deceived.
These are vague terms if you are coming from a different country. It is PC speak, lost in translation.
"Half our students have a diagnosis," is pretty clear. Maybe that wasn't said at the open house they attended. I'm sorry they were confused but I don't think thats the school's fault. The language about learning differences may sound like PC speak to you, but it very specifically describes what McLean does. It is not a special needs school, its a mainstream school that is open and supportive of kids with learning differences. I don't know how else they could describe it. A special needs school is like Lab or Deiner, and that is not at all what McLean is. if they looked at any other schools in addition to McLean they would have seen the ways that McLean is different.
The general community does not view McLean as a mainstream school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The website seems clear that mcLean uses various methods and modalities to teach children with different learning styles. And, the testimonials at the open houses and information sessions make it pretty clear as well. So, I can't imagine who would feel deceived.
These are vague terms if you are coming from a different country. It is PC speak, lost in translation.
"Half our students have a diagnosis," is pretty clear. Maybe that wasn't said at the open house they attended. I'm sorry they were confused but I don't think thats the school's fault. The language about learning differences may sound like PC speak to you, but it very specifically describes what McLean does. It is not a special needs school, its a mainstream school that is open and supportive of kids with learning differences. I don't know how else they could describe it. A special needs school is like Lab or Deiner, and that is not at all what McLean is. if they looked at any other schools in addition to McLean they would have seen the ways that McLean is different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The website seems clear that mcLean uses various methods and modalities to teach children with different learning styles. And, the testimonials at the open houses and information sessions make it pretty clear as well. So, I can't imagine who would feel deceived.
These are vague terms if you are coming from a different country. It is PC speak, lost in translation.
Anonymous wrote:The website seems clear that mcLean uses various methods and modalities to teach children with different learning styles. And, the testimonials at the open houses and information sessions make it pretty clear as well. So, I can't imagine who would feel deceived.