11:08 here. My only point is that it is meant to be "chaos" sort of at least in the early elementary years. If it is all ordered in the classroom then it is either a primary class where order is the key or it is not a Montessori class. Kids have to have freedom before they can make real choices. That is the whole point. So there may be days in early elementary when kids do not appear to be doing much. Certainly my kids had days like that. What you seem to be missing is it is meant to be like that. They are not doing work sheets or busy work. They look like they are just hanging out. They do the odd vague lesson here and there and then it seems like nothing else is happening.
Basically the kids can choose what they want to work on, leave their main classroom for French, the library or a special whenever they want, etc. So if the teacher isn't making sure the kids are doing something, it would be easy for them to mess around all day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:9:14 have you observed the upper grades in action? I think there's a difference between self-guidance and virtually no boundaries. It's borderline Lord of the Flies in there...
That was our issue. One of my children is very self-disciplined and was able to focus just a little bit. My other child took full advantage of all the freedom and did absolutely nothing. I feel like both wasted an entire school year and are suffering greatly because I was too drunk on the CHM@L kool-aid.
The primary program is excellent. Until there's some level of control placed on those elementary classes, especially the big class, I don't see how any child will make any academic progress.
Nothing could be further from the truth. I have not drunk any kool aid but I have had both my kids go through the elementary program at this school and they and their classmates emerged way ahead of kids in traditional. It may seem counter-intuitive but the results speak for themselves. It may look like chaos but the kids are working and develop a work ethic that stays with them for a very long time. It is particularly noticeable in math where what the pp calls "lack of boundaries" means that the kids can go way beyond the traditional curriculum. But I also saw it in language, drama, and history. A number of parents seem to have a lose of nerve about the program in elementary but taking their kids out half way through to me is a big mistake. Some parents seem to be overwhelmed by the sense of chaos rather than looking how what the children become over the entire elementary experience. Kids have to experience some freedom before they can make genuine choices. Once they start making the choices that is when the whole thing comes together. The parents I know who let their kids go through and graduate have absolutely no regrets. It is an awesome program. No kool aid needed.
Basically the kids can choose what they want to work on, leave their main classroom for French, the library or a special whenever they want, etc. So if the teacher isn't making sure the kids are doing something, it would be easy for them to mess around all day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:9:14 have you observed the upper grades in action? I think there's a difference between self-guidance and virtually no boundaries. It's borderline Lord of the Flies in there...
That was our issue. One of my children is very self-disciplined and was able to focus just a little bit. My other child took full advantage of all the freedom and did absolutely nothing. I feel like both wasted an entire school year and are suffering greatly because I was too drunk on the CHM@L kool-aid.
The primary program is excellent. Until there's some level of control placed on those elementary classes, especially the big class, I don't see how any child will make any academic progress.
Anonymous wrote:9:14 have you observed the upper grades in action? I think there's a difference between self-guidance and virtually no boundaries. It's borderline Lord of the Flies in there...