Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To save you from reading the monster thread, I can condense the bottom line: In 2010-2011, appeals supported by a WISC of 126 or higher generally got in, 125 or below, not. The other important factor was the GBRS (11 or higher is key). Good luck!

Thanks! Do you have this information because you were on the screening committee, or did fcps publish the WISC appeal score cut off somewhere?

Just curious where this information it coming from. You seem so assured that I can only assume you have an in or official data to back up the information.

I am not an insider, just a parent who had a child on appeal that year. There is a monster thread where appealers posted their kids' scores and appeal results (the thread is nearly 100 pages long and is still here somewhere), and someone assembled all the data and we could all see how the results trended that year. Not exactly scientific, but we had a pretty good sample and that was the conclusion we all took away.

Less than 2% of the pop has WISC 132+ Does not need to be that high to get in. Good luck.

Anonymous wrote:To save you from reading the monster thread, I can condense the bottom line: In 2010-2011, appeals supported by a WISC of 126 or higher generally got in, 125 or below, not. The other important factor was the GBRS (11 or higher is key). Good luck!

Yes, that was our profile on appeal.

Anonymous wrote:To save you from reading the monster thread, I can condense the bottom line: In 2010-2011, appeals supported by a WISC of 126 or higher generally got in, 125 or below, not. The other important factor was the GBRS (11 or higher is key). Good luck!

Thanks! Do you have this information because you were on the screening committee, or did fcps publish the WISC appeal score cut off somewhere?

Just curious where this information it coming from. You seem so assured that I can only assume you have an in or official data to back up the information.