Anonymous wrote:I'd like to see data on the matter of ultimate adult outcomes for people who were outstanding child and teen athletes. I believe there are outcome risks involved with the idea of too much success too early in life - something like what Springsteen sings about in "Glory Days". In aggregate there are probably equal numbers of people who become successful adults or not, from each cohort of children regardless of their individual athlete talents as children?!?!
There must be studies on this topic out there. If there are any people or psychologists in the DCUM community who have such knowledge it would be good to hear your thoughts.
Thanks
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, watch a couple of episodes of Dance Moms to get an idea of what this world is really like.
Oh please![]()
Dance Moms is a joke among the competitive dance world.
It is nothing like the real thing.
Ask anyone who is actually involved in dance. It is all made up drama for TV. Please don't take that show seriously. Take it at face value: trashy, scripted, reality TV at its worst.
Abbey Lee Miller was frankly nothing notable before this show (no one had ever heard of her or her studio, and her kids were a dime a dozen among scores of talented children filled, over the top, controversial studios to audition. The casting call for this show was sent to many studios, and requested drama) It is all fake stuff put together for television.
Of course the drama is made up, but the types of dances/dancing, the costumes, the competitions ... that's what it's like. And it seems inherently trashy to me -- sorry, but I just can't imagine a serious dance student participating in that kind of thing. Seems one step up from beauty pageants.
Anonymous wrote:Also, google "competitive dance teams" and look at the pictures and videos. Little girls in expensive, often inappropriately sexy costumes and lots of makeup.
My friend's sister in law is a "dance mom" and no, the drama isn't there like it is on the show, but a lot of the other stuff is. Pushy moms (not that OP would be, but it speaks to the atmosphere), lots of pressure, and for what?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I just can't help but wonder, what's the point? If a kid loves the activity, wouldn't they still love just taking a few recreational classes a week? There must be other things the kids would enjoy doing as well. Why choose this type of lifestyle for your family?
Recreational classes and team gymnastics are worlds apart when it comes to what the kids do and can learn to do. Mine wouldn't be satisfied with recreational classes. I would say there are benefits that carry over to other areas of life. Two in particular that come to mind are the ability to handle lots of responsibility and manage time from a young age and the ability to keep at something until you get it rather than giving up because it's hard. As far as what's the point, if your child is successful in it, it's nice to be able to give it to your child.
I realize that there is a huge difference between skills learned in recreational classes vs. highly competitive leagues, but still...I don't see why people put such emphasis on kids sports. Really, what's the big deal?
Anonymous wrote:I have a seven year old who is in a competitive sport. She practices 2-3 days a week and often has meets on the weekends a couple of times a month. In some cases, the meets are two-day events.
I was warned specifically by a coach I trust not to let her practice more than this (I was thinking of bumping her up to four times a week at her request). He said that many kids who could go on to the elite level burn out at around 10 or 12 if they are pushed (or push themselves) too hard too early.
With that in mind, I would think a 5 day a week commitment to the same activity is too much. I also agree that if this is a new team, the owner may be trying to raise revenue or hasn't thought through the impact of asking for that kind of commitment at age 7. She may end up with no team once everybody quits in a year or two.
In terms of why do it to the family, in theory I agree. In real life, though, I can tell you that the sense of accomplishment the kids get from their progress is tremendous. My older kid was asked to join a competitive team last year in a different sport, and her focus on the sport and her pride at being on the team is something to see. She keeps her grades up, is speaking up more in school, and generally is doing well. I would not take that away from her. The little one is already very focused on her sport and glows with pride and excitement whenever she is asked to practice with the bigger kids.
Given the astronomical odds against it, it's pretty safe to say neither will ever go to the Olympics, become a professional athlete or even go to nationals, but they are learning good lessons from sports about focus, working hard to achieve a result, time management, team dynamics and passion. I think those are all lessons worth learning, and I was not really even an athlete growing up. Sometmes we run arond all weekend because of sports. I hate those weekends. Yet, I love what it does for my kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I just can't help but wonder, what's the point? If a kid loves the activity, wouldn't they still love just taking a few recreational classes a week? There must be other things the kids would enjoy doing as well. Why choose this type of lifestyle for your family?
Recreational classes and team gymnastics are worlds apart when it comes to what the kids do and can learn to do. Mine wouldn't be satisfied with recreational classes. I would say there are benefits that carry over to other areas of life. Two in particular that come to mind are the ability to handle lots of responsibility and manage time from a young age and the ability to keep at something until you get it rather than giving up because it's hard. As far as what's the point, if your child is successful in it, it's nice to be able to give it to your child.
Anonymous wrote:My kids are now older, so, to offer some perspective: almost every kid we saw who committed that kind of time at a young age has dropped out of that sport. Some have taken up another activity intensely; some have just cut way back. And many have had multiple injuries and operations.
Just to play devil's advocate for a moment here: why on earth are so many people making an extraordinary commitment to physical activity but not, say, science, from a young age? What possible use is all that time going to be in the long run? She is almost guaranteed to have lifelong injuries from that intensity of physical practice (ask any dancer or gymnast or soccer player), which she would not risk if she were devoting that time to reading, writing novels, learning math, game theory, economics, languages, or history.
Our values are messed up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, watch a couple of episodes of Dance Moms to get an idea of what this world is really like.
Oh please![]()
Dance Moms is a joke among the competitive dance world.
It is nothing like the real thing.
Ask anyone who is actually involved in dance. It is all made up drama for TV. Please don't take that show seriously. Take it at face value: trashy, scripted, reality TV at its worst.
Abbey Lee Miller was frankly nothing notable before this show (no one had ever heard of her or her studio, and her kids were a dime a dozen among scores of talented children filled, over the top, controversial studios to audition. The casting call for this show was sent to many studios, and requested drama) It is all fake stuff put together for television.