Anonymous wrote:Asian and European countries always test better than African and South American countries. It should not be a surprise that there are more Asian and white students in AAP. Just because they represent more of the population doesn't necessarily mean they should be equally represented in AAP. This is not racial discrimination. This is based on academic ability.
Anonymous wrote:So do you think more blacks and latinos should be brought in even if they don't have the grades or ability yet? The only people who seem to be forcing this are the blacks and latinos. Otherwise, race would not have been brought up with AAP.
Anonymous wrote:While FCPS is dumbing down for blacks and latinos? My DS is black and has an IQ of 150+ on the WISC IV and SB. He has been thriving in AAP for several years and continues to outperform peers.
There are MANY children in my sons's AAP classes who are barely working above grade level. But guess what, I don't mind at all. They aren't harming anyone. They aren't taking away an opportunity from my child. In fact, they are enriching his life and he's learning that everyone has strengths in different areas. It also is character building that he's able to help his peers.
This is the problem with so many parents, people in general, they are so afraid of something different. Or someone taking an opportunity from them. Our society is better when everyone has an opportunity to meet their full potential. If your child is truly gifted they will thrive. And if you're concerned they aren't getting enough from the program offer tons of enrichment at home. That's what we do and it works. I don't go around saying why are these dumb white or Asian kids being allowed to learn alongside with my superior son. That sort of talk is offensive. And I'm sick of the notion that it's somehow okay when the races are reversed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Um, what's your point? AAP is now serving a large group of students. Admitting a few under-represented minorities who show promise into the clasee isn't going to hurt anyone. The AAP classes are really not that advanced. They work one grade level above. In my kid's general education class, many of the students work one grade above. I'm sure some of the minority students could handle it, even if they don't have the exact test scores to normally be admitted.
Large group, let's say 20%. Let's say increase it to 25% to admit them.
Why do you feel it's OK to reject equally or better qualified White or Asian kids?
Yes!
"In my kid's general education class, many of the students work one grade above."
Yes it's called Level III AAP. What's your point?
That there is no real distinction between Level III and Level IV services.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So FCPS AAP is already very generous comparing to national average..
Dilute it more? It should actually contract.
Correct, it should be about 5 to 6% of the student pop & no more. Or they should just do away with it
Anonymous wrote:
Yes, this.
Anonymous wrote:
That there is no real distinction between Level III and Level IV services.
Anonymous wrote:OP why are you so afraid that your kids will be hurt by admitting more kids to AAP. If your kids naturally smart, curious and driven, it won't matter whether s/he learns about Aristotle in 5th grade or 7th grade. Your child's ultimate trajectory in life is not going to be changed by a change in the FCPS curriculum adding more kids into AAP (probably at other schools). But just for the sake of argument, let's say another 5-10 kids (black and hispanic) are allowed into your kid's class and the lessons are *quite* as fast as they were last year in this same school.... SO WHAT!
I'm guessing by your interest in this issue and education in general, that your household has educated adults who are interested in the world and who give their children many opportunities to think about and learn about reading/math/science/politics/philosophy/etc. Assuming that your worst fears come to be, any "dilution" of the curriculum is NOT going to change your kids' ability to succeed in HS, college, grad school and beyond. It's just not. Do you realize that most of the great inventors did not have access to a GT/AAP type of education?
I know we all get protective and want the best for our kids and we all have hopes for their lives to be really happy and successful with no limitations, but the arguments I'm seeing for stopping the spread of AAP seem to be over-the-top and self centered.
Be confident -- your AAP kid is stellar --- he/she will still be stellar if other kids get access to AAP.
Anonymous wrote:
Um, what's your point? AAP is now serving a large group of students. Admitting a few under-represented minorities who show promise into the clasee isn't going to hurt anyone. The AAP classes are really not that advanced. They work one grade level above. In my kid's general education class, many of the students work one grade above. I'm sure some of the minority students could handle it, even if they don't have the exact test scores to normally be admitted.
Large group, let's say 20%. Let's say increase it to 25% to admit them.
Why do you feel it's OK to reject equally or better qualified White or Asian kids?
Yes!
"In my kid's general education class, many of the students work one grade above."
Yes it's called Level III AAP. What's your point?
Anonymous wrote:There should be no discrimination against equally or more qualified Asian or White kids.