Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a very anti-SAHM board OP so you are unlikely to get a balanced answer. Many women would not want to be at home with their kids regardless of income threshhold. You need to make the decision that is right for you. There are benefits to being at home for some people. A reduction in stress, more family time, less chaotic mornings and evenings, greater influence in raising children, spending more time with the kids...depending on your view there can be positive mental health and relational outcomes as well. You need to weigh what the benefits to you would be against the priority you place on wealth and climbing the corporate ladder.
I'm not anti-SAHM for women who have more potential to contribute to society through child raising than paid work, but yeah, for highly educated and skilled women, it does seem like a waste.
Anonymous wrote:Here is my experience. I chose to say home when my twins were 5 months old. I left a 6 figure medical sales position. At the time I had been in my sales career for 11 years. My husband has an even better career in finance for a fortune 50 company. We also made his decision in February 2009 when at the time layoffs were the norm. Our plan was to sah until the boys were at least 3 but if we could get them to KG we would before I returned to work. So how did everything work out. Great actually. My husband says now that he felt really proud and a good provider during the time I was home. At the time I left my position, everyone said I was crazy to ggive up my position, but I felt the crazy decision was to continue working ft. The kicker is this fall I got an offer with another great company, same industry making more money and great future growth. My career didn't suffer at all like most will tell you on this board, it actually wouldn't be any different if I continued working. In total I was home 4 years with my boys, they went to 1/2 day preschool 3 days a week last year and this year are doing great at their full time pre k class. Financially our income of course was down for those four years, but we just cut back expensese, but net worth wise we did just fine. What I miss the most is the flexibility we enjoyed with me not working. It allowed us to take some great family vacations during those years. So yes we did it, no family close by, no nannies, I have great memories of the boys early years, and would not make the choice to continue working if I could do it over again. Everyone circumstances are different, marriages are all unique, personal goals vary etc. I just wanted to offer my story to let other families see that real people do still choose to stay home. It is not always about the money people.
Anonymous wrote:Was in a similar situation and I decided it wasn't worth it for me to continue to work. I couldn't justify spending over half of my salary for some one else to take care of my dc. At times, we have to make sacrifices but nothing major, and we know this is temporary and we will be able to enjoy certain "luxuries" when I return to work in a few years. Also my husband and I made the decision that 2-4 years of having only one income to contribute to retirement accounts will not impact us that significantly, considering I would not have been able to contribute all that much while I was working and paying for childcare. You really just have to think about what is best for your family, how easy it will be to re-enter the work force, and what you think you will need as a woman/wife/mom to stay balanced.
Anonymous wrote:This is a very anti-SAHM board OP so you are unlikely to get a balanced answer. Many women would not want to be at home with their kids regardless of income threshhold. You need to make the decision that is right for you. There are benefits to being at home for some people. A reduction in stress, more family time, less chaotic mornings and evenings, greater influence in raising children, spending more time with the kids...depending on your view there can be positive mental health and relational outcomes as well. You need to weigh what the benefits to you would be against the priority you place on wealth and climbing the corporate ladder.
Anonymous wrote:Is there a certain income you have to earn over your childcare costs to make it worthwhile for you to continue working? In my case care costs a little over half of my income and about a quarter of our HHI and I am seriously tempted to quit.
Anonymous wrote:Is there a certain income you have to earn over your childcare costs to make it worthwhile for you to continue working? In my case care costs a little over half of my income and about a quarter of our HHI and I am seriously tempted to quit.
Anonymous wrote:Here is my experience. I chose to say home when my twins were 5 months old. I left a 6 figure medical sales position. At the time I had been in my sales career for 11 years. My husband has an even better career in finance for a fortune 50 company. We also made his decision in February 2009 when at the time layoffs were the norm. Our plan was to sah until the boys were at least 3 but if we could get them to KG we would before I returned to work. So how did everything work out. Great actually. My husband says now that he felt really proud and a good provider during the time I was home. At the time I left my position, everyone said I was crazy to ggive up my position, but I felt the crazy decision was to continue working ft. The kicker is this fall I got an offer with another great company, same industry making more money and great future growth. My career didn't suffer at all like most will tell you on this board, it actually wouldn't be any different if I continued working. In total I was home 4 years with my boys, they went to 1/2 day preschool 3 days a week last year and this year are doing great at their full time pre k class. Financially our income of course was down for those four years, but we just cut back expensese, but net worth wise we did just fine. What I miss the most is the flexibility we enjoyed with me not working. It allowed us to take some great family vacations during those years. So yes we did it, no family close by, no nannies, I have great memories of the boys early years, and would not make the choice to continue working if I could do it over again. Everyone circumstances are different, marriages are all unique, personal goals vary etc. I just wanted to offer my story to let other families see that real people do still choose to stay home. It is not always about the money people.
Anonymous wrote:Is there a certain income you have to earn over your childcare costs to make it worthwhile for you to continue working? In my case care costs a little over half of my income and about a quarter of our HHI and I am seriously tempted to quit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a very anti-SAHM board OP so you are unlikely to get a balanced answer. Many women would not want to be at home with their kids regardless of income threshhold. You need to make the decision that is right for you. There are benefits to being at home for some people. A reduction in stress, more family time, less chaotic mornings and evenings, greater influence in raising children, spending more time with the kids...depending on your view there can be positive mental health and relational outcomes as well. You need to weigh what the benefits to you would be against the priority you place on wealth and climbing the corporate ladder.
I find it ironic that you are posting about an anti-SAHM sentiment when you've reduced working to being all about "wealth and climbing the corporate ladder." What BS. I realize I shouldn't bother explaining why this has nothing to do with reality (the vast majority of people in this area don't work for corporations, for one, there a lot of folks in public service and working for nonprofits because they GASP love what they do). And not everyone has the option of "wealth." But I get that admitting this would involve admitting a whole bunch of stuff you aren't ready to do, so I'll let it go and let you keep your smug defensiveness.
Anonymous wrote:This is a very anti-SAHM board OP so you are unlikely to get a balanced answer. Many women would not want to be at home with their kids regardless of income threshhold. You need to make the decision that is right for you. There are benefits to being at home for some people. A reduction in stress, more family time, less chaotic mornings and evenings, greater influence in raising children, spending more time with the kids...depending on your view there can be positive mental health and relational outcomes as well. You need to weigh what the benefits to you would be against the priority you place on wealth and climbing the corporate ladder.