Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would assume the issues facing most "failing schools" have more to do with poverty than the actual system. There is an ugly culture that is often associated with it. You can hire the best teachers in the world but little will change if students come from homes that do not value education. Until we can change that than those schools will continue to fail.
This.
In another decade or two, the poverty rate in DC will be roughly the same as the rest of the region. And the schools will be some of the best in the country. Gentrification works.
DC spends more money per student than any other district in the nation - throwing more money at the school system is not going to yield further results. The issues that remain are community and cultural issues that need to be addressed outside of the school system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would assume the issues facing most "failing schools" have more to do with poverty than the actual system. There is an ugly culture that is often associated with it. You can hire the best teachers in the world but little will change if students come from homes that do not value education. Until we can change that than those schools will continue to fail.
Exactly this^^.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: In another decade or two, the poverty rate in DC will be roughly the same as the rest of the region. And the schools will be some of the best in the country. Gentrification works.
Not necessarily. E.g. San Fran has had even more robust gentrification than DC for much longer yet its school system is not of of the country's best. Far from it. As long as resistance to academic tracking/ability grouping remains strong in middle schools in both cities, despite years of gentrification at warp speed, no stellar schools will result. Far-reaching policy changes must accompany demographic changes for "the best" to emerge. As long as schools toss high achievers and low achievers into the same classrooms before AP classes (as at Deal, Stuart Hobson, Hardy, Washington Latin and even BASIS) for political reasons, the results will remain lackluster.
Anonymous wrote:I would assume the issues facing most "failing schools" have more to do with poverty than the actual system. There is an ugly culture that is often associated with it. You can hire the best teachers in the world but little will change if students come from homes that do not value education. Until we can change that than those schools will continue to fail.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, I agree with the original thread title. Of course, it is impossible to turn around a failing school- by only looking at the school. Failing schools are often in communities with failing- well everything. Failing job rates, failing health care, failing at providing safe stable housing for kids. Failing in providing prenatal care. I am NOT suggesting that we have to address all these issues- but this is why schools in 'poor areas' fail. (For someone that will bring up charters, ok go ahead... talk about how the charters work with the same kids (they don't) and get the same results (they don't). You either have to embrace the entire community, think Harlem Childrens Zone in NYC, or throw your hands up and wait for the community to improve itself.
All kids want to learn, they do. And people go into teaching because they love kids. Sure there are some exceptions, but every job has terrible people- who eventually leave the profession.
If you want to fix failing schools schools- help the community. If you do not, and that is ok, just walk away.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would assume the issues facing most "failing schools" have more to do with poverty than the actual system. There is an ugly culture that is often associated with it. You can hire the best teachers in the world but little will change if students come from homes that do not value education. Until we can change that than those schools will continue to fail.
This.
In another decade or two, the poverty rate in DC will be roughly the same as the rest of the region. And the schools will be some of the best in the country. Gentrification works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would assume the issues facing most "failing schools" have more to do with poverty than the actual system. There is an ugly culture that is often associated with it. You can hire the best teachers in the world but little will change if students come from homes that do not value education. Until we can change that than those schools will continue to fail.
This.
In another decade or two, the poverty rate in DC will be roughly the same as the rest of the region. And the schools will be some of the best in the country. Gentrification works.
Only if you define "best" by how students score on standardized tests. These same schools may not be very good if judged by the quality of educational opportunities offered.
If you like the poverty stuff, go see Diane Ravitch in Brooklyn or on line. All she does is hurl names at her opposition and talk about "social context."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would assume the issues facing most "failing schools" have more to do with poverty than the actual system. There is an ugly culture that is often associated with it. You can hire the best teachers in the world but little will change if students come from homes that do not value education. Until we can change that than those schools will continue to fail.
This.
In another decade or two, the poverty rate in DC will be roughly the same as the rest of the region. And the schools will be some of the best in the country. Gentrification works.
Only if you define "best" by how students score on standardized tests. These same schools may not be very good if judged by the quality of educational opportunities offered.
Anonymous wrote:It's "turn around," two words, when used as a verb OP. Not "turnaround" (noun).