Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I heard they "encouraged" a special ed student to leave before classes even started.
Yes, they did. Many of us on Capitol Hill know the family. The brilliant child tested into 5th grade algebra. If it happens to at least one other family, there will be op-ed pieces. Shame on Basis.
Anonymous wrote:I heard they "encouraged" a special ed student to leave before classes even started.
Anonymous wrote:Dear Basis,
Thank you for being the Kim Kardashian of public schools in DC. It is so much more comfortable in the shade.
Love,
Yu Ying
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Who said anything about students failing in "large numbers" in this thread? Nowhere was that said.
17:07.
They suggested that "If" students are failing in large numbers it was a failure, not that they had evidence that they were.
Anonymous wrote:It's the same old story.
Started out with talk of one child leaving...
Then, some speculation added about why that child left, with a possible reason being the child was failing...
Not unusual or controversial that one or a few students may leave a school, for reasons that may include failing, or instead that there may be other reasons, like family or social reasons.
And 17:07 then somehow leapt to the conclusion that a "large number" of students were failing.
Seems to be this obsessive compulsion to keep speculating, leaping to conclusions and using successive rounds of even more speculating and leaping to conclusions which build upon each other to come up with these spun-out-of-control yarns around here... Hey, I heard some big guy named Paul Bunyan was spotted at the school chasing after an enormous ox.
Anonymous wrote:If the students are failing in large numbers, then, obviously BASIS is failing. Sad to hear it happening so soon. Didn't they just open this year?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who said anything about students failing in "large numbers" in this thread? Nowhere was that said.
17:07.
Anonymous wrote:Who said anything about students failing in "large numbers" in this thread? Nowhere was that said.