Anonymous wrote:Playground time at our school is free play, the adults watch and also spot the kids on some of the climbing things.
Anonymous wrote:I am never on this site. I don't live anywhere near DC, but I teach early childhood education to college students and I observe in LOTS of preschools including the Lab School on our campus. Teachers should be treating outdoor time as teachable curriculum time. They should be interacting with children not only for safety purposes but to encourage physical development and social development as well as language and literacy skills. The time should be loosely planned with teachers bringing different materials and activities to the playground. As always, not every preschooler will be interested in doing the same thing at the same time. That is to be expected. But there should be planned, intentional experiences for children indoors and outdoors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:2.5 to young 3s class:
Referee kids, watch gate exits, spot kids on climbing equipment, take pictures. Occasionally they will facilitate or just initiate a game of hide and go seek or something, but the focus is really getting the kids to play with each other or independently. There is plenty of time for structure inside. I also don't think they could do their job of safely monitoring the kids and the playground as a whole if they were involved with individual kids.
What about the 1.5 to 2.5's?
I'm more worried about safety in that age group than any "socializing interventions". Will the teachers also stand together, and only monitor from a distance??
Anonymous wrote:I am never on this site. I don't live anywhere near DC, but I teach early childhood education to college students and I observe in LOTS of preschools including the Lab School on our campus. Teachers should be treating outdoor time as teachable curriculum time. They should be interacting with children not only for safety purposes but to encourage physical development and social development as well as language and literacy skills. The time should be loosely planned with teachers bringing different materials and activities to the playground. As always, not every preschooler will be interested in doing the same thing at the same time. That is to be expected. But there should be planned, intentional experiences for children indoors and outdoors.
Anonymous wrote:2.5 to young 3s class:
Referee kids, watch gate exits, spot kids on climbing equipment, take pictures. Occasionally they will facilitate or just initiate a game of hide and go seek or something, but the focus is really getting the kids to play with each other or independently. There is plenty of time for structure inside. I also don't think they could do their job of safely monitoring the kids and the playground as a whole if they were involved with individual kids.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing, other than intervening in disagreements, etc. Kids need free play and need to learn how to navigate those social relationships on the playground without much intervention from teachers.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. This class is 2yr/3yr so these kids are very young. I am not as much worried about safety as I am about my child playing alone. She needs to be encouraged to participate and I hate the idea of her playing there alone. She always tells us "I did the monkey bars and no one helped me". I dont know if she is saying it proudly or as though she's wishing someone assisted her.
Anonymous wrote:I was in for a conference at my DC new preschool today. I noticed that the kids teachers (and this is of a young 3s class) all talking together on the playgrounds while all the kids ran around on a fairly big playground. Is this normal? I dont want to over react but I expected my teachers of my very young preschooler to be actively playing with the children and not standing to the side chatting to the each other. I send my child to preschool so they're taught how to engage socially with other kids. If i wanted them to play alone, i would have a nanny.