Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:only the intelligent women are voting for romney... twats are still voting for nobama.

Yes, it takes a lot of intelligence to come up with "twats" (so rarely used these days!) and "nobama." That's poetry, man.

I thought conservatives did not have nicknames for Obama.

Anonymous wrote:only the intelligent women are voting for romney... twats are still voting for nobama.

Yes, it takes a lot of intelligence to come up with "twats" (so rarely used these days!) and "nobama." That's poetry, man.

Anonymous wrote:over half of the babies who are murdered are females, so that is the biggest "women issue" out there.

wait? who's murdering babies? what the hell? nobody told me about this... You mean, like fully gestational, delivered and then killed babies, right?

Anonymous wrote:only the intelligent women are voting for romney... twats are still voting for nobama.

What does Romney think 47% of women are unintelligent?

only the intelligent women are voting for romney... twats are still voting for nobama.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mitt has BINDERS FULL of women, yo. You know it's true. BINDERS FULL.

See...
http://bindersfullofwomen.tumblr.com/

And once a quarter he REVIEWED those binders, or had someone on his staff do it for him.

Anonymous wrote:Mitt has BINDERS FULL of women, yo. You know it's true. BINDERS FULL.

See...
http://bindersfullofwomen.tumblr.com/

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, it's much more palatable to make sure those babies are born, so their dads can decide to kill them in vairous horrible ways, and try again sooner for a boy.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2218381/Indian-wife-dies-baby-daughter-suffers-horrific-burns-husband-set-slept-dowry-dispute.html

Or how about we tie them up in chains and throw them in the family swimming pool for offending the family "honor"? Yeah that sounds fun! Invite the neighbors! http://itdawnedonme.wordpress.com/tag/samira-ahmed-jassim/

good use of throwing in a completely unrelated argument! GOOD JOB, GOOD EFFORT!!! pretty sure EVERYONE is against murdering your children after they are born, and only the truly horrible are ok with murdering them before they are born.

Yeah, it's much more palatable to make sure those babies are born, so their dads can decide to kill them in vairous horrible ways, and try again sooner for a boy.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2218381/Indian-wife-dies-baby-daughter-suffers-horrific-burns-husband-set-slept-dowry-dispute.html

Or how about we tie them up in chains and throw them in the family swimming pool for offending the family "honor"? Yeah that sounds fun! Invite the neighbors! http://itdawnedonme.wordpress.com/tag/samira-ahmed-jassim/

over half of the babies who are murdered are females, so that is the biggest "women issue" out there.

A woman here that does not vote on 'women's issues'.

Anonymous wrote:Why would a women only vote based on women's issues? Doesn't that compound the problem? Don't take issue with "women's issues" make changes on your own.

The problem is that these male politicians who are interfering in "women's issues" are a threat to my liberty and that of my daughters. If I don't have liberty - total freedom to have sex, to use birth control, to have a baby or not have a baby, to take an emergency pill if I am (legitimately) raped, to be married or single or even in a same sex relationship - when politicans start dictating these choices to me, they threaten my fundamental liberty. And I don't care if unemployment is 8%; without liberty I am not a full participant in your economy anyway. All these decision these guys want to make for me have a huge economic impact on me.

"Give me a good economy or give me death!" - Patrick Henry. Oh wait, no, the fundamental thing he died for is LIBERTY. And Republicans want to take women's lib away. My boss should have a say in my contraceptive coverage? Really??? When Republicans are no longer the party of Vaginal wands, AZ laws defining pregnancy and menstruation, and MO Senators talking about real rape and female biology, I might give a R) a fair hearing. Until then, I vote all pro-choice, all the time.

Anonymous wrote:Why would a women only vote based on women's issues? Doesn't that compound the problem? Don't take issue with "women's issues" make changes on your own.

No one votes "only" on women's issues. And men vote on women's issues as well. We all benefit from eliminating gender bias.

Anonymous wrote:Why would a women only vote based on women's issues? Doesn't that compound the problem? Don't take issue with "women's issues" make changes on your own.

Women's issues are worth protecting, because women are more able to get an education, get a well-paying job, and raise healthy children with these rights. And while they may not impact you significantly because of your education, HHI, etc., these rights are critical to lower-income women.

How about having a little faith that people are principled? Men should care about these issues too.

That doesn't tell you how they should care. There are women on both sides of these issues.