Anonymous wrote:NP. I am a recovering "trying to be a relaxed parent of K." I felt the same as OP when my kids were in K because the curriculum seemed so slow. My ideal was a super small class size and an accelerated curriculum, but was not in a position to pay $25K a year per child.
While I was antsy, my kids, who performed above grade level across the board, were NOT. They were not bored or unhappy in any way. On the contrary, they were happy to breeze through the reading/math and LOVED art, science and history and also, just being around friends.
My concerns were that they were not working at their potential and that they were learning to "coast." I am still a bit concerned about the "coasting" part - I sought out activities that would challenge them outside of school to address this. Otherwise, I am coming to see things a different way - that my kids have years and years and years ahead of working hard and finding ways to max out their academic potential and that the first few years - as long as there is a soild foundation - really should be about getting the kids off to a happy, positive start to their "formal" education. I've become more sensitive to the "race to nowhere" culture common in this area, taken a deep breath and made big attempts just to let them be kids for now. I am still very invested and involved, but have taken a few steps back from worrying so much about how challenged my kids are at school right now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our K and 1st are bored out of their mind. At least the 1st grade teacher will let a group of them get a book from the library and read. The K teacher insists all participate in alphabet learning.
The sad part is there are 3 K classes, they could easily split the kids up by ability and challange them all. Instead, every class has the entire range.
So stop complaining and send you kids to Nysmith if K and 1st are sooooo boring. Seriously, if you have nice and engaging children they will learn and grow in just about any environment. Especially in the area that they need it most at that age, social skills! But you're probably filling their heads with how much smarter they are than the others and how bored they should be instead of teaching them how to make friends, accept others and how to learn something in any situation.
I am going to speak in behalf of the poster. For the person that replied above, you sure are defensive. I know...I know....just shut up and color. Our Educational System is all good for our lower elementary kids, right? Everything is peachy king. Is that what you are saying??? Hmmmm...who are you voting for? Or do you even care???
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our K and 1st are bored out of their mind. At least the 1st grade teacher will let a group of them get a book from the library and read. The K teacher insists all participate in alphabet learning.
The sad part is there are 3 K classes, they could easily split the kids up by ability and challange them all. Instead, every class has the entire range.
So stop complaining and send you kids to Nysmith if K and 1st are sooooo boring. Seriously, if you have nice and engaging children they will learn and grow in just about any environment. Especially in the area that they need it most at that age, social skills! But you're probably filling their heads with how much smarter they are than the others and how bored they should be instead of teaching them how to make friends, accept others and how to learn something in any situation.
Anonymous wrote:I've asked the teacher before and am told he'll get challenging work but it turns out they mean just once every two weeks or as homework. I would like to see challenging work done in the classroom on a very regular basis. This is really a math issue for us since they spend a lot less time on this subject and seem to fit in differentiation somewhere in the long language arts block.
Anonymous wrote:If your child has been to preschool, FCPS Kindergarten will be very, very easy. Too easy. Now that my second child has started school in FCPS, I've realized that the entire Kindergarten - 2nd grade is just a matter of biding time until they are allowed to enter a more rigorous AAP program.
I'll be the first to say that my kids are smart, but not truly gifted. The schools are so busy teaching basic English to a diverse population that many kids who could do more are being forced to do worksheets of things that they learned in preschool. So many kids aren't being challenged at all. I just hope my kids don't fall in the gap of being not gifted enough for AAP, yet too bright for the regular curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:Our K and 1st are bored out of their mind. At least the 1st grade teacher will let a group of them get a book from the library and read. The K teacher insists all participate in alphabet learning.
The sad part is there are 3 K classes, they could easily split the kids up by ability and challange them all. Instead, every class has the entire range.
Anonymous wrote:The schools are so busy teaching basic English to a diverse population that many kids who could do more are being forced to do worksheets of things that they learned in preschool. So many kids aren't being challenged at all. I just hope my kids don't fall in the gap of being not gifted enough for AAP, yet too bright for the regular curriculum.
Anonymous wrote:The sad part is there are 3 K classes, they could easily split the kids up by ability and challange them all. Instead, every class has the entire range.
Anonymous wrote:Our 2nd grade class still hasn't had their DRA and no reading groups yet but there are word study groups. Anyone else in that boat?