I think Obama should be more aggressive. He said "sorry" for crying out loud!

But I think his messages are far more spot on and substantive. And his attacks on Romney are thoughtful.

I don't think Obama is doing such a bad job. He is reserved. Romney seems like he had too much caffeine.

Anonymous wrote:Romney is flat out lying. I would like to think that would count against him but I am not sure it will.

It is killing me that the pundits will talk about things like demeanor and tone of voice and NOBODY WILL TOUCH the blatant untruths in this debate. Your news media!

Anonymous wrote:Romney is flat out lying. I would like to think that would count against him but I am not sure it will.

Right. And taking excessive time. Apparently you can just suddenly change your plans 5 weeks before the election.

Anonymous wrote:Obama voter, here. i agree. Romeny way more prepared than pres on this, but they are talking economy and that's where the pres is weakest. Stay tuned for the rest of the show...

I'm speechless.
I'm guessing you are a Fed, who does not have to live in the real world.

wait wait wait, is obama seriously trying to say that Romney is not giving substantive debate and that he is offering no real plans.... hasnt that been the standard answer line of the white house press secretary for the last four years and saying just vote yes for our 1000 page policy???

Romney is flat out lying. I would like to think that would count against him but I am not sure it will.

Obamas stories worked with his change for america and new hope rhetoric against an old vet and his simple alaskan. but now were 4 years into the change and its still the same as per usual. Romney is a well oiled business machine whos been mesmorizing hearts and minds with a winning business model for decades.

Did anyone notice in the beginning of the debate, Romney was like "If everyone gets a tax cut upper income people should too," and then five minutes later said he wasn't going to cut taxes on upper income people? Did I just imagine that???

Anonymous wrote:
they are talking economy and that's where the pres is weakest.


Exactly. That's why he needs to go. America stand 4 more years of his bumbling economic policy.

You know full-well in your heart and mind that the president inherited a screwed up economy. He needs 4 more years (at least) for disaster clean up.

I know full-well that Obama in his own words said that if he couldn't turn it around in 4 years he didn't deserve a second term. I agree with him.

Obama voter from "08. Romney is winning, not even a close call. Have that sinking feeling that Obama can't adequately defend his policies and record. When the flash and dazzle factor is taken away and it is simply two people defending their ideas, Obama looks unprepared. Obama's stories are just about distracting from the policies. That worked 4 years ago (worked on me), don't think it will work this time.

Obama is a deer in headlights. Wtf?

The reason why Romney is winning is because what he is saying resonates with the American people. Obama had four years and it sounds like he is running against an incumbent.

Romney is HYPER. His energy is exhausting. On the other hand, Obama seems flat.

We've heard absolutely nothing new from the president tonight, seriously, more of the same.