Since I am from a farm state I am not worried about starving. For one because eight of the top ten agricultural states are in the north you idiot, and because unless the south actually exports food, it is even more screwed.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the toughest part would not be the constitutional process. The balance sheet for the South is the problem. The southern states would go almost immediately into default because they can't cover their expenditures with revenue, even if the new southern nation kept the current Federal tax schedule. They are net dependents on northern revenue.
It's scary that you're that clueless as to where your food comes from, not to mention the cotton in your tighty whittles.
You should give that Vermont milk and cheese diet a try for a month, ok, I'll let you have one apple a week too.
Anonymous wrote:I think the toughest part would not be the constitutional process. The balance sheet for the South is the problem. The southern states would go almost immediately into default because they can't cover their expenditures with revenue, even if the new southern nation kept the current Federal tax schedule. They are net dependents on northern revenue.
Anonymous wrote:Yep, and the northern states like Illinois, Connecticut, NJ, NY, and RI can go bankrupt. Sry, but the utter snobbery of this thread is offensive.
If you think those are the states that would go bankrupt, your ignorance is offensive. "Sry."
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/pf_article_113173.html
Yep, and the northern states like Illinois, Connecticut, NJ, NY, and RI can go bankrupt. Sry, but the utter snobbery of this thread is offensive.
Anonymous wrote:Do you remember the map that circulated a while after GWB was re-elected? The north + ne+ west coast became part of Canada and the rest became Jesusland? (Funny though offensive to genuine Christians.)
On a serious note, wouldn't the process be akin to what other countries have experienced? Czechoslovakia, the Koreas?
Presumably OP would prefer a peaceful separation, not one preceded by war.
I would actually love to see a real experiment--let's pick a few states where the Extreme Conservative agenda could be carried out for a limited time (like 3-5 years) to see whether their ideas could work. No abortion or birth control, low tax rates for the wealthy, no regulation of any industry, drill as much as you like...
Anonymous wrote:I think the only way it could work would be if everything that is currently handled by the federal government were operable on a state level - or via consortia of states. Once that was accomplished, then the states or consortia could band together, I suppose, into two sets of "united states". But what's more likely is that you would wind up with a whole ton of tiny little state-sized countries. Some would be successful, some would not. I think. I don't know. This is too hard to think about on a Friday night!