Anonymous wrote:12:16 - You realize that Personal Care Truth is run by two scientists from the cosmetics industry, right? I think I'll take the independant EWG recs over the cosmetic industry telling me how safe things are.
And I tend to use some Dr. Haushkas, and assorted others. Check ingredient labels for the usual parabens and the like.
If by "two scientists from the cosmetics industry" you mean small, independent business owners of cosmetics companies focused on natural ingredients, then yes, I do realize that.
Kristin Fraser Cotte is the founder of The Grapeseed Company--premium eco-friendly skin & personal care from locally grown, certified organic and natural ingredients. Lisa M. Rodgers is CEO and founder of Cactus & Ivy, a wholesale/retail manufacturer of cruelty free and vegan, natural bath and body products. See
http://personalcaretruth.com/about/about-kristin/ and
http://personalcaretruth.com/about/about-lisa/
Kristin was originally a signer of the EWG's Compact for Safe Cosmetics, but asked to be removed "due to the detrimental direction the Campaign was heading in squashing small businesses, along with the lack of science behind their agenda." Asked multiple times, and yet two years later, her company was still listed as a signer. (The compact has since been phased out, so I don't know if or when her company was ever removed.) See
http://www.greenskincareblog.com/2010/07/safe-cosmetic-act-of-2010-is-not.html
They don't really sound like industry shills to me. And EWG doesn't report their funding sources, so how do you know they are "independent"?
If you want to counter my actual points, I'd be happy to engage in a discussion about what is really safe. Skin Deep equates hazard with risk, when the two are not the same thing AT ALL (risk = hazard x exposure). Their actual hazard ratings are very subjective, some chemicals are listed under two different names with different scores, and they often treat data gaps as a good thing (but not consistently!). So what benefit do I get from using it?