Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm really puzzled by the PP who hates anyone living in a smaller older home in a neighborhood with teardowns. That's me, and I'm not sure what I ever did to you. I like some of the rebuilds in my neighborhood, and dislike some of them, on the merits - some have been done tastefully, in a way that doesn't look ridiculous, and some are literally so wacky looking that they have become the butt of jokes on this forum and elsewhere. But why would anyone who either lives in those houses or wants to bash me for living in a 2000 sqft place that could use more work? To suggest that I'm either intensely jealous of the rebuilds or that I can't afford my neighborhood is just patently false. Wrong on both counts.
YES!! Or to assume we don't have the $. We love old houses. We hate clutter, unused-- wasted space, etc. we only have two children and no need for more than 2200 sq feet.
We could afford a mammoth addition, etc. We are in 22201 and make a shitload of money and we actually own two houses in more affluent neighborhoods than this in the city. We moved here for public schools and found great neighbors. Surprising to now see some in the 'hood may be judging us on the size of our house....ESP the ones that bought 10 years ago when sh*t was dirt cheap over here. They paid $600k less than the rest of us, btw.
It wasn't dirt cheap in 22201, 10 years ago. Even 40 years ago it wasn't dirt cheap. Generally speaking, Arlington has always been expensive, just much less expensive than today in some neighborhoods. A large 4 bedroom colonial in 22201 or 22207 that sold for 300k in 1988 or 150k in '78 is probably close to 2 mill today.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm really puzzled by the PP who hates anyone living in a smaller older home in a neighborhood with teardowns. That's me, and I'm not sure what I ever did to you. I like some of the rebuilds in my neighborhood, and dislike some of them, on the merits - some have been done tastefully, in a way that doesn't look ridiculous, and some are literally so wacky looking that they have become the butt of jokes on this forum and elsewhere. But why would anyone who either lives in those houses or wants to bash me for living in a 2000 sqft place that could use more work? To suggest that I'm either intensely jealous of the rebuilds or that I can't afford my neighborhood is just patently false. Wrong on both counts.
YES!! Or to assume we don't have the $. We love old houses. We hate clutter, unused-- wasted space, etc. we only have two children and no need for more than 2200 sq feet.
We could afford a mammoth addition, etc. We are in 22201 and make a shitload of money and we actually own two houses in more affluent neighborhoods than this in the city. We moved here for public schools and found great neighbors. Surprising to now see some in the 'hood may be judging us on the size of our house....ESP the ones that bought 10 years ago when sh*t was dirt cheap over here. They paid $600k less than the rest of us, btw.
Anonymous wrote:I'm really puzzled by the PP who hates anyone living in a smaller older home in a neighborhood with teardowns. That's me, and I'm not sure what I ever did to you. I like some of the rebuilds in my neighborhood, and dislike some of them, on the merits - some have been done tastefully, in a way that doesn't look ridiculous, and some are literally so wacky looking that they have become the butt of jokes on this forum and elsewhere. But why would anyone who either lives in those houses or wants to bash me for living in a 2000 sqft place that could use more work? To suggest that I'm either intensely jealous of the rebuilds or that I can't afford my neighborhood is just patently false. Wrong on both counts.
....ESP the ones that bought 10 years ago when sh*t was dirt cheap over here. They paid $600k less than the rest of us, btw.Anonymous wrote:Where in Arlington can you get a house on a quarter acre lot for $750K!? Are you somewhere else (Fairfax, maybe?)
20815, actually. Didn't realize you could post on this thread only if you were talking about 22207. If you think a less than 1200 sq ft house with no AC, 1 bathroom, ancient appliances, a pathetic maintenance history, really bad layout with no clear bedrooms or driveway, a basement that is beyond creepy, and sloping floors sounds like something people would be clamoring for, then I suggest you keep your eye out because they are out there. They come up very infrequently because most people have already added on or torn down in these close-in areas, I think.
Anonymous wrote:I used to be annoyed by the people who built lot-crowding, light blocking houses in my neighborhood, but I soon realized that I should be kind to the poor souls living in them, because they are obviously jealous that they can't have a house with the kind of craftsmanship and history that mine has.
It's the only possible explanation for saying you don't like something: You really DO like it and are jealous of people who have it. There is no possibility that preferences differ.
Where in Arlington can you get a house on a quarter acre lot for $750K!? Are you somewhere else (Fairfax, maybe?)
Anonymous wrote:
PP, the Cracker Barrel analogy is *expected* but not accurate.
Of my friends who live in new houses and bought before the recession (so they are doubly lucky, if you will); their neighborhoods ALL started out with mostly old homes and are now ALL mostly new homes. Who would have thunk? Certainly not the ones who WISHED the neighborhoods stayed old, conveniently so that their horrible additions (on their old houses, obviously) would not look so dreadfully out of place!
Change happens. Get over it. Sorry if you don't look like you can afford the neighborhood (in your old house), but you don't own the neighborhood (regardless that you think you should). Period. Besides, you sound ridiculous trying to desperately detract from the inevitable.
If I could afford one of those gorgeous new homes, I would. What is the harm in admitting it? It sounds far more true and convincing than being so clearly jealous and ugly about it. If you want to live amongst old houses, just move. It's easy.
Anonymous wrote:We are tearing down an 1100 sq ft home and building a much larger one on a quarter acre lot. Several of the houses around it are not huge but have been added onto so that they are maybe 2,200 to 3,000 sq ft. Further down the street there are houses of a similar size to or larger than our new one. This is in an area of very pricey homes, where $750K or so is clearly the entry point, and we paid $750K for the tear down. The upper limit is in the millions, $4 or more, I think.
We have had some problems with neighbors over the construction. What is bizarre about it in our case is you only have to go one or two streets over or just further down our street to see homes even bigger and literally a million or two more than our house, yet this little end of the street seems to think it is its own enclave. Luckily everything we want to do is within the zoning rules, and the house is in keeping with the look of the houses around it, even though it is much larger. No Potomac castle for us.