She put it on him. Once you go black you never go back

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe we're still using the word "mistress" in 2012.

Why? Isn't that what she is? What do you prefer... his homewrecker? His madame? His girlfriend?

His ho? His piece on the side? It is what it is.

WHERE IS THE LOVE CHILD????? THEY MUST HAVE ONE, HIDDEN AWAY LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE THEY DO

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mistress is fine, just wish there were an equivalent for men.

See, THAT's what gripes me. Such a sexist term...even in a sordid sex tale.

alright - I get this. But it doesn't mean that the term in this sordid tale is incorrect, just that it doesn't have an equivalent if it was the wife who had been cheating.

By the way, I wasn't criticizing the people on this thread who used the term, but rather the media (and world!) at large.

I call my side piece my "boy toy."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mistress is fine, just wish there were an equivalent for men.

See, THAT's what gripes me. Such a sexist term...even in a sordid sex tale.

alright - I get this. But it doesn't mean that the term in this sordid tale is incorrect, just that it doesn't have an equivalent if it was the wife who had been cheating.

Anonymous wrote:Mistress is fine, just wish there were an equivalent for men.

See, THAT's what gripes me. Such a sexist term...even in a sordid sex tale.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sanford hid in the bathroom while the waiter at the restaurant gave his mistress the ring. That pretty much sums everything up.

Wait-- really?! Oh my G-d!! What a loser!

From the Atlantic Wire:

The manager said Sanford settled on a table for two near the door, and left the engagement ring in a small box with one of the waiters, telling him to give it to Chapur when she arrived. Then he hid out in the bathroom for disabled guests, where cracking open the door provides a direct view of the table, and waited for more than an hour before she finally arrived, the manager said.

Floozy, or "bit of stuff", are the preferred terms.

Anonymous wrote:Sanford hid in the bathroom while the waiter at the restaurant gave his mistress the ring. That pretty much sums everything up.

Wait-- really?! Oh my G-d!! What a loser!

Mistress is fine, just wish there were an equivalent for men.

Sanford hid in the bathroom while the waiter at the restaurant gave his mistress the ring. That pretty much sums everything up.

Anonymous wrote:No one knows what really goes on in a marriage. Side piece or not, his marriage to Jenny Sanford would probably have imploded anyway, not that, that's an excuse to get a side peice.

no matter how awful your marriage might be, what he did in such a public way was just inexcusable. Bad marriage or no, they had kids that he hurt in the process of following his pecker to greener pastures.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe we're still using the word "mistress" in 2012.

I prefer the term 'side ho'

lmao.

HAHAHA

No one knows what really goes on in a marriage. Side piece or not, his marriage to Jenny Sanford would probably have imploded anyway, not that, that's an excuse to get a side peice.