Anonymous wrote:Good grief. I'm an attorney. My wife is an engineer. Despite all of our education, we have to spend about $1,000 a year on a tax professional just to figure out whether we're paying Uncle Sam the right amount. And guys like Mitt Romney can game the system to load up an IRA with $100 million. The tax code needs to be reformed. It should be simpler and fairer. I'm sorry, but there's no way on earth that I should pay 30% to Uncle Sam while at the same time struggling to save for my retirement, much less put enough away for my kids' future college educations (which will top $100k each per year at this rate, if not more), while Mitt Romney makes $57,000 a day and pays 13% gaming the tax code.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/02/business/inquiry-on-tax-strategy-adds-to-scrutiny-of-finance-firms.html?_r=1&hp
This New York Times article is about some either quasi-legal or illegal money movement at Bain and several other companies like it. They're under investigation by the NY Attorney General.
A clue to part of Myth's reluctance to release his taxes?
1) The NY Attorney General doesn't enforce the tax code.
2) The Senate Finance Committee was looking into the fee conversion issue as long ago as 2007. This is hardly a new discovery. (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aYdxW3YnhjK4&refer=home)
3) Calling him "Myth" really undercuts your credibility.
4) All of that said, I do think there's some no-nos there.
Perhaps, but how much credibility do you really give to an anonymous Internet poster? Me, not necessarily so much.
Of course I view any Internet post with skepticism. But calling someone "Myth" or "Barry" or some other childish thing just makes the trolls easier to spot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/02/business/inquiry-on-tax-strategy-adds-to-scrutiny-of-finance-firms.html?_r=1&hp
This New York Times article is about some either quasi-legal or illegal money movement at Bain and several other companies like it. They're under investigation by the NY Attorney General.
A clue to part of Myth's reluctance to release his taxes?
1) The NY Attorney General doesn't enforce the tax code.
2) The Senate Finance Committee was looking into the fee conversion issue as long ago as 2007. This is hardly a new discovery. (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aYdxW3YnhjK4&refer=home)
3) Calling him "Myth" really undercuts your credibility.
4) All of that said, I do think there's some no-nos there.
Perhaps, but how much credibility do you really give to an anonymous Internet poster? Me, not necessarily so much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/02/business/inquiry-on-tax-strategy-adds-to-scrutiny-of-finance-firms.html?_r=1&hp
This New York Times article is about some either quasi-legal or illegal money movement at Bain and several other companies like it. They're under investigation by the NY Attorney General.
A clue to part of Myth's reluctance to release his taxes?
1) The NY Attorney General doesn't enforce the tax code.
2) The Senate Finance Committee was looking into the fee conversion issue as long ago as 2007. This is hardly a new discovery. (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aYdxW3YnhjK4&refer=home)
3) Calling him "Myth" really undercuts your credibility.
4) All of that said, I do think there's some no-nos there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/02/business/inquiry-on-tax-strategy-adds-to-scrutiny-of-finance-firms.html?_r=1&hp
This New York Times article is about some either quasi-legal or illegal money movement at Bain and several other companies like it. They're under investigation by the NY Attorney General.
A clue to part of Myth's reluctance to release his taxes?
1) The NY Attorney General doesn't enforce the tax code.
2) The Senate Finance Committee was looking into the fee conversion issue as long ago as 2007. This is hardly a new discovery. (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aYdxW3YnhjK4&refer=home)
3) Calling him "Myth" really undercuts your credibility.
4) All of that said, I do think there's some no-nos there.
Right you are. However, the NY Attorney General does enforce NY's tax laws.
How come no one can explain how Mitt came to have a $100M IRA given the very low annual contribution limits?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/02/business/inquiry-on-tax-strategy-adds-to-scrutiny-of-finance-firms.html?_r=1&hp
This New York Times article is about some either quasi-legal or illegal money movement at Bain and several other companies like it. They're under investigation by the NY Attorney General.
A clue to part of Myth's reluctance to release his taxes?
1) The NY Attorney General doesn't enforce the tax code.
2) The Senate Finance Committee was looking into the fee conversion issue as long ago as 2007. This is hardly a new discovery. (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aYdxW3YnhjK4&refer=home)
3) Calling him "Myth" really undercuts your credibility.
4) All of that said, I do think there's some no-nos there.