Anonymous wrote:

CAN YOU READ????? Your own posts no less? OMG this is so annoying - you are insane! is this a blackout?

1) Subject of this thread = "The Ryan-Akin non-forcible rape bill."

2) The opening line of this entire thread = "they think that non-forcible rape is ok."

3) Your prior comment (or some other loon's) = "this is a reference to ACTUAL BILLS that the Republican Party has proposed this year."

You need to calm down a bit. It looks like the stress of being on the losing side of an election is getting to you. Ryan did co-sponsor a bill with Akin which attempted to redefine rape, using the term "forcible rape" to distinguish between whatever other kinds of rape they might believe exists. Abortion would be allowed in the case of "forcible rape", but not other kinds. Saying they thought non-forcible rape is "ok" is an exaggeration, but they clearly tried to distinguish between types of rape.

The bill that attempted to redefine rape is an actual bill.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Um, you are aware that this is a reference to ACTUAL BILLS that the Republican Party has proposed this year. Right? I mean do you even read the news, at all?

Right, like yeah, right, right,. . . (LOON!!!!!)

I got 100% on reading comprehension on the LSATs - clearly, you could not. So, let me dumb this down for you - NO BILL SAYS RAPE IS OKAY. Got it? Rape is a felony crime too, in case you were unaware of that.

Nobody said there is a bill that says rape is OK. I think YOUR reading comprehension is the issue here.

CAN YOU READ????? Your own posts no less? OMG this is so annoying - you are insane! is this a blackout?

1) Subject of this thread = "The Ryan-Akin non-forcible rape bill."

2) The opening line of this entire thread = "they think that non-forcible rape is ok."

3) Your prior comment (or some other loon's) = "this is a reference to ACTUAL BILLS that the Republican Party has proposed this year."

^^sorry PSATs