Anonymous wrote:But if a kid is willing to work hard, why is getting the extra help a problem? Some kids had extra help and worked hard to take the admissions exam, and then they might want to continue to get extra help and work hard in classes at school.
Some of the freshmen were being required by their teachers to get extra help during study hall. If they are willing to work hard with the teacher helping them, why is that any different from getting help to prepare for the entrance exam? If it was acceptable to get extra help before taking the entrance exam, why shouldn't it be just as acceptable to get extra help when they are actually attending the school? Isn't it all just hard work and preparation which will lead them to success, whether it occurs before they take the exam or after?
Anonymous wrote:So, then it's really not a problem that one third of the freshman class at TJ needs extra help.
Anonymous wrote:The FCPS vision for TJ was a school for those who are passionate in math and science and excel in them. If DC needs a lot of prepping to get in, perhaps DC does not belong there. That is probably why 1/3 of the freshman class needed remedial math and science tutoring. They prepped and got in - once there, they couldn't keep up. Not very good for a teen's self esteem.
Anonymous wrote:Really then why bother with attending school at all!!! We could save millions/billions with doing away with schools in general and everyone can learn via the computer!
These teachers need to make an effort and COVER the material they are suppose to teach! It is ridiculous to toss the complete blame on the students -- the teachers and administrators are also accountable for the problems. I think some of the TJ teachers just got lazy since all the previous classes could make-up for their teaching inadequacies but with the application changes the newer crop of students couldn't overcome their lack of teaching.
Really...open your eyes and mind. This wish may be closer at hand than you think. Come back in 25 to 50 years.
Really then why bother with attending school at all!!! We could save millions/billions with doing away with schools in general and everyone can learn via the computer!
These teachers need to make an effort and COVER the material they are suppose to teach! It is ridiculous to toss the complete blame on the students -- the teachers and administrators are also accountable for the problems. I think some of the TJ teachers just got lazy since all the previous classes could make-up for their teaching inadequacies but with the application changes the newer crop of students couldn't overcome their lack of teaching.
Anonymous wrote:
Whine, whine, whine. If you have difficulty just google the topic! Try Sol Khan. Kids at TJ are not of below average intelligence. Since when did any public or privae school teacher today provide self motivated students with much enlightenment. Those teachers are far and few between in my experience. Thank God for the internet and a myriad of on-line and off-line resources for some of today's students cursed with bad teaching.
Really then why bother with attending school at all!!! We could save millions/billions with doing away with schools in general and everyone can learn via the computer! These teachers need to make an effort and COVER the material they are suppose to teach! It is ridiculous to toss the complete blame on the students -- the teachers and administrators are also accountable for the problems. I think some of the TJ teachers just got lazy since all the previous classes could make-up for their teaching inadequacies but with the application changes the newer crop of students couldn't overcome their lack of teaching.
They are "teaching" themselves what the teacher should at the very least cover in class. We are talking about stuff the teacher needs to cover -- you are suppose to follow a curriculum!!!! The students should not have to go home and teach themselves what the teacher should go over. And yes, my child would "learn" the stuff ahead of time and maybe the teacher will go over it and maybe not.
Some of these teachers will solve the problems but get the wrong answers and then refuse to correct themselves when they are shown it is wrong by studeents (yes, this happened in child's chemistry class). The teacher insisted she was correct and that was that. After awhile, they just ignored her since she gave the wrong answers and her teaching sucked. The students helped each other to overcome this teacher otherwise they were in a world of trouble when they took the AP Chemistry class. It was the luck of the draw -- you get the bad teacher and you are in trouble when you move onto the higher level course.