Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think there are some families/parent(s) who do not care about education and do not value it. They themselves did not get educated and are "doing ok" meaning getting by on a low wage job with government support. It's hard for a child who lives that way. That's their "normal" and you are basically having to say that their family and parents are not normal.
I think the gap grows larger because the kids who are average or above average achievers also have parents who are highly vested in making sure their child gets more than just the standard education in the classroom. When you have children then who are getting hours of outside learning whether it be via direct instruction in activities, tutoring, etc or from just interaction with parents, it is almost impossible for the child who is just getting the standard education at school to keep up.
I think that many schools and principals get caught up in trying to implement programs and plans with catchy names and titles when what is likely needed is serious repetitive teaching of basic skills until those kids who are lagging get caught up.
I agree, but the higher-achieving children will struggle and flee from a drill and kill environment. That is why our city needs options for gifted children in order to help everyone. It is impossible to effectively teach children at so many different levels in the same classroom without at least some pull-out periods for differentiation. This process will go much more quickly as soon as everyone realizes this very simple fact and stops calling such standard programs racist or classist.
DCPS reformers disagree with this. According to their institutionalized belief system, an effective well-paid teacher can teach differentiated lessons to kids at various levels who are all in the same classroom. In fact, the reformers think that a really good teacher can take on more and more kids in the same classroom and still do a great job reaching all the kids.
Anonymous wrote:I think we are talking apples and oranges. With regard to latinos, I think it will be the same as with other immigrants, who have historically always closed the achievement gap within a generation to become integrated and successful. With the AA community, however, it's been multi-generational. Yes, a fundamental paradigm shift in AA culture is needed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think there are some families/parent(s) who do not care about education and do not value it. They themselves did not get educated and are "doing ok" meaning getting by on a low wage job with government support. It's hard for a child who lives that way. That's their "normal" and you are basically having to say that their family and parents are not normal.
I think the gap grows larger because the kids who are average or above average achievers also have parents who are highly vested in making sure their child gets more than just the standard education in the classroom. When you have children then who are getting hours of outside learning whether it be via direct instruction in activities, tutoring, etc or from just interaction with parents, it is almost impossible for the child who is just getting the standard education at school to keep up.
I think that many schools and principals get caught up in trying to implement programs and plans with catchy names and titles when what is likely needed is serious repetitive teaching of basic skills until those kids who are lagging get caught up.
I agree, but the higher-achieving children will struggle and flee from a drill and kill environment. That is why our city needs options for gifted children in order to help everyone. It is impossible to effectively teach children at so many different levels in the same classroom without at least some pull-out periods for differentiation. This process will go much more quickly as soon as everyone realizes this very simple fact and stops calling such standard programs racist or classist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you find out what the problems are, can you address them? It is wonderful for the reach out and concern but what can you do with such an over-whelming outcome? Why not gather the AA parents who are doing things positive and reach out collectively to all. Therefore, the good, better and best scenario will encompass all to be continually successful. I applaud the outreach but I am apprehensive in the approach. I am assuming as an individual you will include those who are employed with DCPS to facilitate such a meeting?
As for the gap, is it the goal to close it gradually? Can we look at the overall improvement as miniscule it is of .05% and build upon it? There's not a parent who doesn't want the best for their child in the realm of education. We have become the microwave generation. Put in, push buttons, set the time and produce a proficient child....beep! Then if not good enough, reheat and produce an advance child.
10:08, I can't put my finger on it, but your post hit a nerve. Can you explain more...
The thing is, if you are willing to accept 0.5% improvement a year, then the school system will only improve by 6% in the 12 years your child is in school. That's not enough when less than half the kids are proficient.
In today's Washington Post article about the scores, the Chancellor essentially said the slow increase is OK by her: "“I can’t live or die by annual test scores”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you find out what the problems are, can you address them? It is wonderful for the reach out and concern but what can you do with such an over-whelming outcome? Why not gather the AA parents who are doing things positive and reach out collectively to all. Therefore, the good, better and best scenario will encompass all to be continually successful. I applaud the outreach but I am apprehensive in the approach. I am assuming as an individual you will include those who are employed with DCPS to facilitate such a meeting?
As for the gap, is it the goal to close it gradually? Can we look at the overall improvement as miniscule it is of .05% and build upon it? There's not a parent who doesn't want the best for their child in the realm of education. We have become the microwave generation. Put in, push buttons, set the time and produce a proficient child....beep! Then if not good enough, reheat and produce an advance child.
10:08, I can't put my finger on it, but your post hit a nerve. Can you explain more...
The thing is, if you are willing to accept 0.5% improvement a year, then the school system will only improve by 6% in the 12 years your child is in school. That's not enough when less than half the kids are proficient.
Anonymous wrote:11:08, Thanks for the input. Yes, I was originally thinking about getting more than just the low performing AA students and parents together and make this a school wide effort to help close the gap. I don't have a specific percentage that I would like to see achieved. Just movement in a positive direction. I will speak with the principal and see what the school is trying to do, if anything at all. In the meantime, I will work with my neighborhood school(they were only at 50% proficient) and recreation center to inquire about setting up some intensive academic assistance.