Anonymous wrote:Hahha liberals, running out of other peoples money since the dawn of their precious communist russia.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:... (It gets treated as an LA exurb, and exurbs' housing prices don't hold up well, as we have seen empirically.)
Strange redundancy.
Strangely nit-picky complaint.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:... (It gets treated as an LA exurb, and exurbs' housing prices don't hold up well, as we have seen empirically.)
Strange redundancy.
Anonymous wrote:Native Californian here. San Bernardino is full of rednecks, has always been economically depressed over the course of my lifetime, and was hit hard by the housing bubble. (It gets treated as an LA exurb, and exurbs' housing prices don't hold up well, as we have seen empirically.)
Anonymous wrote:Haha socialist fail again
Anonymous wrote:HAH. Is this the america the liberals want?
San Bernardino, CA, votes for bankruptcy filing3
The city council of San Bernardino, California, voted on Tuesday to file for bankruptcy, marking the third time in recent weeks a city in the most populous U.S. state has opted to seek protection from its creditors.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/11/us-sanbernardino-bankruptcy-idUSBRE86A05320120711
Yepper! Maybe it's ultimately the conservatives in California who are responsible for this problem!Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is the tax structure in Ca. The property tax does not reflect the current value of the property. Have family out there. Live in a house in Palo Alto. Houses in their neighborhood sell for 4-10 million. They paid property tax on like 235k. Also, Ca federal tax dollars return is low, like 78 cent on the dollar. These are the result of the conservatives- conservative socialism at it best.
This is because California voters, conservative and liberal alike, passed Prop 13 in 1978, which severely limits property taxes (and has other ramifications for taxation as well).