Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Life begins at conception. I would say for myself that I am against abortion - but I think the choice should be available. But life still begins at conception. If you are going to have an abortion you might as well deal with the reality that a life is being lost.
But this doesn't correspond to most people's emotional reality. Most people don't mourn the loss of an early miscarriage the same way they would mourn the loss of a stillbirth or child's death. Most people are much more comfortable with abortion in the early stages, than they are with later-term abortions. The "life" being lost when it's a zygote just is not the same thing as the life being lost when it's fully developed. Certainly, most parents doing IVF discard embryos without too much trauma ... because they never really regarded those embryos as babies, but rather as potential babies. Thus, a zygote/embryo is not really fully human, in my opinion, if we define "human" as an entity that is on par with all other humans. "Life" and "human being" are not the same thing -- just think about it, a dead body is a human being, but there is no life. Similarly, an embryo is alive, but not a human being.
I definitely mourned my miscarriage (although I have not had a stillbirth to compare it to). For someone to tell me that the fetus I was carrying wasn't a child. My child. Is very upsetting. But this is just how I feel. I know others don't necessarily feel the same and I do see what you are saying.
Anonymous wrote:But isn't there a big enough grey area with abortion, that elected representatives pretty much need to deal with it? Using your logic, abortion should be a free for all. A woman would be able to terminate for any reason right up to delivery, assuming she could find a physician willing to go along with it.
Anonymous wrote:Very pro choice here. I would agree to restricting abortion to say the first x number of weeks, a definitely NOT viable number like 14, except in cases of risk to the life of the mother.
What I do NOT want is my freaking state legislature writing laws which talk about vaginas and menstrual periods. Leave it to the woman and her doctor to determine the gestation with generally medically accepted methods. SO pissed off when elected representatives start talking about lady business.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Life begins at conception. I would say for myself that I am against abortion - but I think the choice should be available. But life still begins at conception. If you are going to have an abortion you might as well deal with the reality that a life is being lost.
But this doesn't correspond to most people's emotional reality. Most people don't mourn the loss of an early miscarriage the same way they would mourn the loss of a stillbirth or child's death. Most people are much more comfortable with abortion in the early stages, than they are with later-term abortions. The "life" being lost when it's a zygote just is not the same thing as the life being lost when it's fully developed. Certainly, most parents doing IVF discard embryos without too much trauma ... because they never really regarded those embryos as babies, but rather as potential babies. Thus, a zygote/embryo is not really fully human, in my opinion, if we define "human" as an entity that is on par with all other humans. "Life" and "human being" are not the same thing -- just think about it, a dead body is a human being, but there is no life. Similarly, an embryo is alive, but not a human being.
Anonymous wrote:Life begins at conception. I would say for myself that I am against abortion - but I think the choice should be available. But life still begins at conception. If you are going to have an abortion you might as well deal with the reality that a life is being lost.
yes, but we can only control the fate of the soul after conception.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:God said " I knew you before you were formed in your mothers womb"....the answer of course , is at conception.
Wouldn't that mean before conception?
Anonymous wrote:pro choice
Faced with the decision 53 yrs ago at the ages of 19 &17 we married rather than have a"back room" abortion. Our 53rd anniv was 7/3 Still very happily married
The thought of our daughter not be a wonderful contributing member of society confirms all our decisions FOR US
We live in a county where, in theory, church and state ate separate. By foisting your religious convictions upon others who do not believe as you do, your arrogance in doing so, violates all that make this country unique?
Abortion when and if is a choice best made by the two people who conceived the child, not the government, not a church i may or may not believe in and not a G - d whose not anyone else but the two people or just the mother as dictated by circumstance. rape, incest health, etc.
We'd all be best served if all you G-d fearing zealots
kept your beliefs to yourself and cease with your insane demonstrations, justification, incentivizing the murder of Md's
and heartless taunting of women seeing abortion.
When is life prior to birth, is a personal, ethical choice, not one to be dictated by a church,or a government
Anonymous wrote:God said " I knew you before you were formed in your mothers womb"....the answer of course , is at conception.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At the point of viability, or when the mother decides she wants to have the baby, whichever comes first.
Pro-choice. I see viability as the point at which a fetus becomes a human. I really don't understand the viewpoint above. How does the point as to when an individual decides when she wants a baby have any bearing on as to when a fetus actually becomes human?