Anonymous
06/18/2012 22:19
Subject: Re:I was wondering. . .
Anonymous wrote:Why there are women Republicans.
Why are there GAY Republicans?
They are hopeful?
Anonymous
06/18/2012 21:49
Subject: Re:I was wondering. . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why women belong to religious organizations that prioritize men to the detriment of women.
Why some posters have to drag catholicism (no, I'm not one) into every friggin' thread.
Couldn't the subjugation of women pretty much fit into any organized religion? I didn't instantly leap to Catholicism when I read PP's post.
Uh, no. And it doesn't seem worth explaining, because you don't seem like the type to listen.
Are you Catholic?
Scratch that.
What was that about "listening" again?
Anonymous
06/18/2012 21:49
Subject: I was wondering. . .
Anonymous wrote:Why do drivers just sit in the left lane when they're not passing anyone?
And why do drivers stop at traffic lights leaving 1-2 carlengths of space between their own car and the one in front of them? Particularly when it means I'm right behind them and can't get into the turn lane that's opening up right next to them?
Don't know about the left-laners. Some people leave at least a car length between their car and the one in front of them in case they are rear-ended. That way they don't hit the car in front of them. Irritates me, too, at turn lanes.
Anonymous
06/18/2012 21:42
Subject: Re:I was wondering. . .
Why there are women Republicans.
Why are there GAY Republicans?
Anonymous
06/18/2012 21:39
Subject: Re:I was wondering. . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why women belong to religious organizations that prioritize men to the detriment of women.
Why some posters have to drag catholicism (no, I'm not one) into every friggin' thread.
Couldn't the subjugation of women pretty much fit into any organized religion? I didn't instantly leap to Catholicism when I read PP's post.
Uh, no. And it doesn't seem worth explaining, because you don't seem like the type to listen.
Islam? Yeah, so empowering for women. Judaism? Women can't be rabbis. Southern Baptist? Not gonna go there.
Anonymous
06/18/2012 21:39
Subject: Re:I was wondering. . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why women belong to religious organizations that prioritize men to the detriment of women.
Why some posters have to drag catholicism (no, I'm not one) into every friggin' thread.
Couldn't the subjugation of women pretty much fit into any organized religion? I didn't instantly leap to Catholicism when I read PP's post.
Uh, no. And it doesn't seem worth explaining, because you don't seem like the type to listen.
Are you Catholic?
Scratch that.
Anonymous
06/18/2012 21:37
Subject: Re:I was wondering. . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why women belong to religious organizations that prioritize men to the detriment of women.
Why some posters have to drag catholicism (no, I'm not one) into every friggin' thread.
Couldn't the subjugation of women pretty much fit into any organized religion? I didn't instantly leap to Catholicism when I read PP's post.
Uh, no. And it doesn't seem worth explaining, because you don't seem like the type to listen.
Are you Catholic?
Anonymous
06/18/2012 21:36
Subject: Re:I was wondering. . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why women belong to religious organizations that prioritize men to the detriment of women.
Why some posters have to drag catholicism (no, I'm not one) into every friggin' thread.
Couldn't the subjugation of women pretty much fit into any organized religion? I didn't instantly leap to Catholicism when I read PP's post.
Uh, no. And it doesn't seem worth explaining, because you don't seem like the type to listen.
Anonymous
06/18/2012 21:34
Subject: Re:I was wondering. . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why women belong to religious organizations that prioritize men to the detriment of women.
Why some posters have to drag catholicism (no, I'm not one) into every friggin' thread.
Couldn't the subjugation of women pretty much fit into any organized religion? I didn't instantly leap to Catholicism when I read PP's post.
Anonymous
06/18/2012 21:33
Subject: Re:I was wondering. . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why women belong to religious organizations that prioritize men to the detriment of women.
Why some posters have to drag catholicism (no, I'm not one) into every friggin' thread.
It's not limited to Catholics.
Anonymous
06/18/2012 21:30
Subject: Re:I was wondering. . .
Anonymous wrote:Why women belong to religious organizations that prioritize men to the detriment of women.
Why some posters have to drag catholicism (no, I'm not one) into every friggin' thread.
Anonymous
06/18/2012 21:07
Subject: I was wondering. . .
Anonymous wrote:Why do wealthy white people in this country ignore the fact that America got 200 years of free labor?
Paying for it with crime and taxes for welfare and prisons. There are consequences for every action.
Anonymous
06/18/2012 21:04
Subject: I was wondering. . .
Anonymous wrote:Why do wealthy white people in this country ignore the fact that America got 200 years of free labor?
Why some DCUM folks always take the bait when race is mentioned. Sometimes it is best to just let it go.
Anonymous
06/18/2012 21:01
Subject: I was wondering. . .
Why there are women Republicans.
Anonymous
06/18/2012 21:00
Subject: Re:I was wondering. . .
Why women belong to religious organizations that prioritize men to the detriment of women.