
I don’t know if this applies to PS or PK, even at public schools. There is not a right to attend PS – the “right” to attend public schools starts at kindergarten. DC has a policy of providing PS to all residents, but not sure that it rises to the level of an entitlement to enroll.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The PP obviously missed the article on the FRONT PAGE of the washington post last year.
Yes, public schools can have a policy - and if there are children with IEP's / developmental delays there are other rules.
Last year my child had a lot of accidents (maybe 2 a week at the beginning of the school year) and the school (not IT) was very supportive of working with us - but it was a case by case basis.
No the PP did not miss the article. Read it again carefully. "That's why she was suspended from her preschool. For a month." The child was suspended, not expelled. And, if I knew the parents? I would have suggested they contact their lawyers and let them talk about the likely forthcoming lawsuit.
(In this case the parent is advocating for the school to change its policy, to benefit other children.)
Public schools are for everyone, not just those who can use the potty. They cannot expel children for not being potty-trained.
For the record, this is why some schools opt not to bother with PS/3. They are smart enough to know they're stuck with a problem that is highly likely to resolve itself by PK/4.
Anonymous wrote:I can see why some people might think that a policy of having kids toilet trained might sound punitive but seriously, folks, these are three year olds. Unless they have some physical or social problems there is NO REASON why a three year old shouldn't be toilet trained. I imagine that schools have this policy to encourage lazy parents to train their kids.
Our son will be the youngest in his class (birthday end of September) but he's been toilet trained for over a year now. And at night time for more than six months. He was not "advanced" in any way. The reason he was potty trained "early" is because we, as parents, made an effort to actually train him before he turned two. We did it in three days and have never used pull-ups. There is no reason why the rest of you can't do this! (Though I do agree that wiping skills take some practice).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can see why some people might think that a policy of having kids toilet trained might sound punitive but seriously, folks, these are three year olds. Unless they have some physical or social problems there is NO REASON why a three year old shouldn't be toilet trained. I imagine that schools have this policy to encourage lazy parents to train their kids.
Our son will be the youngest in his class (birthday end of September) but he's been toilet trained for over a year now. And at night time for more than six months. He was not "advanced" in any way. The reason he was potty trained "early" is because we, as parents, made an effort to actually train him before he turned two. We did it in three days and have never used pull-ups. There is no reason why the rest of you can't do this! (Though I do agree that wiping skills take some practice).
This is the OP. OK, well telling us now that we are crappy parents by not doing this a year ago is MOST helpful. A parent of mine just died and its been a hard year with his illness with tons and tons of travelling. But please, go ahead and continue judging.
Anonymous wrote:I can see why some people might think that a policy of having kids toilet trained might sound punitive but seriously, folks, these are three year olds. Unless they have some physical or social problems there is NO REASON why a three year old shouldn't be toilet trained. I imagine that schools have this policy to encourage lazy parents to train their kids.
Our son will be the youngest in his class (birthday end of September) but he's been toilet trained for over a year now. And at night time for more than six months. He was not "advanced" in any way. The reason he was potty trained "early" is because we, as parents, made an effort to actually train him before he turned two. We did it in three days and have never used pull-ups. There is no reason why the rest of you can't do this! (Though I do agree that wiping skills take some practice).
Anonymous wrote:Hi all - my DD will be entering PS in the fall. She is close to the cutoff so on the younger side. She is doing pretty well with potty training, but I want to make sure that we have her fully prepared. She will be going to Inspired Teaching.
- Currently she is wearing underwear most of the day and rarely has accidents, and in the next two weeks we will be cutting out pull ups for nap time and outings (most of the time they are dry).
- However, she needs to be prompted to go to the potty, probably on an hourly basis. If she is into playing with something she will not stop and tell us she needs to go.
- She doesn't want to poop on the potty. We will be working on that one the most.
- She is fine wiping for #1, but not for #2 (since she rarely goes in the potty).
- She has trouble pulling her underwear and pants up in the back.
So I guess my questions are, how often are they taking these little ones to the potty? And are they going to help them get their pants back up? I KNOW we need to fix the poop issue. TIA!