Anonymous wrote:Good. I hope this is their death rattle. Hopefully other charities -- who give more directly to the cause rather than administrative needs -- will benefit all the more.
Anonymous wrote:Good. I hope this is their death rattle. Hopefully other charities -- who give more directly to the cause rather than administrative needs -- will benefit all the more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yay
Good for you and your 1 left breast
First of all, I am pro-choice. Second, it is clear that most of you have completely bought the planned Parenthood PR campaign. However, I do feel compelled to point out that the reason given by Komen for stopping funding to Planned Parenthood was that PP does not provide breast cancer screenings. Not one single PP facility nationwide provides mammography services. In other words, Komen was paying PP overhead, just so they could refer women to other providers for breast cancer screenings. Komen made the decision that it would be a better use of their funds to pay those providing breast cancer screenings directly. PP was the one who claimed that the decision was based on an anti-abortion agenda. Why would they do that? Because they knew that they could generate public outrage that would force Komen to reverse itself, or at a minimum, generate publicity that would harm Komen and help their own fundraising. It worked. The press, and posters here, now dutifully report that the controversy was over abortion. Komen still provides funding, and, as far as I know,
You are not telling the truth. Their stated reason was the congressional investigation of PP.Anonymous wrote:First of all, I am pro-choice. Second, it is clear that most of you have completely bought the planned Parenthood PR campaign. However, I do feel compelled to point out that the reason given by Komen for stopping funding to Planned Parenthood was that PP does not provide breast cancer screenings. Not one single PP facility nationwide provides mammography services. In other words, Komen was paying PP overhead, just so they could refer women to other providers for breast cancer screenings. Komen made the decision that it would be a better use of their funds to pay those providing breast cancer screenings directly. PP was the one who claimed that the decision was based on an anti-abortion agenda. Why would they do that? Because they knew that they could generate public outrage that would force Komen to reverse itself, or at a minimum, generate publicity that would harm Komen and help their own fundraising. It worked. The press, and posters here, now dutifully report that the controversy was over abortion. Komen still provides funding, and, as far as I know,
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here -- sorry -- meant to conclude: and as far as I know, it continues to be true that no Planned Parenthood facility actually provides abortion services.
My plea: please, in the future, don't believe everything you read in a newspaper, much less on line. Just because you agree with the goals of an organization, do not blindly believe that their motives are always pure.
It is also true that planned parent hood doesn't provide mammograms, the only approved and reimbursable breast cancer screening method, I guess there will be a surge in pro choice breast cancer, lol
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/komens-accidental-case-against-breast-exams/2011/08/25/gIQAz3LTnQ_blog.html
Anonymous wrote:PP here -- sorry -- meant to conclude: and as far as I know, it continues to be true that no Planned Parenthood facility actually provides abortion services.
My plea: please, in the future, don't believe everything you read in a newspaper, much less on line. Just because you agree with the goals of an organization, do not blindly believe that their motives are always pure.