Anonymous wrote:I am a super liberal. This seems like a sad tragedy, and there may be understandable (though not excusable) reasons the mom wasn't home. Perhaps not, too.
One way or another though this mother had more children than she could care for well. And it is frustrating that people don't stop having children when they are struggling to care for the ones they have. Being poor doesn't mean everything in life is out of your hands. I wouldn't even argue a poor person shouldn't have children, but I do think the number of kids she had and the conditions they were all living in suggests a reluctance to take appropriate responsibility for herself/life.
When people insist that a person should be exempt from criticism for certain life choices they've made because they are poor and black, that in and of itself is racist and patronizing. Young, poor, black women can make good choices for themselves, but this person didn't. (and lots of young, poor, white women make bad choices too...and rich white women...just in this case this person was black, and I think the unwillingness to hold her at all responsible for her life is it's own form of prejudice).
PP here. I didn't say it was. But I've known people who had too many children who at some point became responsible and got their kids to school every day and to tutoring and other programs. I don't know anything about this woman so I don't know if she is like that or not. That's I'm withholding my condemnation until I know more about her or at least the reason that she was gone from the home.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Before judging the mom for being away from home, I'd like to know why she was away from home. If she was out partying, we should condemn that. If she was working the graveyard shift on poorly paid job and she couldn't afford childcare, that's another matter.
So if I leave my kid home alone while I work, that's ok? Or only if I can't afford to pay someone else to watch my brood? There is no excuse for leaving four children eight and under at home alone -- that's why most states have laws against it.
The fact that the children had several different fathers is irrelevant as to why she was gone that night.
I agree with this statement -- [i]what I don't agree with is that having more kids than you can afford (regardless of the number of fathers) is not per se evidence of bad parenting.
Anonymous wrote:I am a super liberal. This seems like a sad tragedy, and there may be understandable (though not excusable) reasons the mom wasn't home. Perhaps not, too.
One way or another though this mother had more children than she could care for well. And it is frustrating that people don't stop having children when they are struggling to care for the ones they have. Being poor doesn't mean everything in life is out of your hands. I wouldn't even argue a poor person shouldn't have children, but I do think the number of kids she had and the conditions they were all living in suggests a reluctance to take appropriate responsibility for herself/life.
When people insist that a person should be exempt from criticism for certain life choices they've made because they are poor and black, that in and of itself is racist and patronizing. Young, poor, black women can make good choices for themselves, but this person didn't. (and lots of young, poor, white women make bad choices too...and rich white women...just in this case this person was black, and I think the unwillingness to hold her at all responsible for her life is it's own form of prejudice).
Anonymous wrote:Before judging the mom for being away from home, I'd like to know why she was away from home. If she was out partying, we should condemn that. If she was working the graveyard shift on poorly paid job and she couldn't afford childcare, that's another matter.
[i]So if I leave my kid home alone while I work, that's ok? Or only if I can't afford to pay someone else to watch my brood? There is no excuse for leaving four children eight and under at home alone -- that's why most states have laws against it.
The fact that the children had several different fathers is irrelevant as to why she was gone that night.
Anonymous wrote:Before judging the mom for being away from home, I'd like to know why she was away from home. If she was out partying, we should condemn that. If she was working the graveyard shift on poorly paid job and she couldn't afford childcare, that's another matter.
The fact that the children had several different fathers is irrelevant as to why she was gone that night.
Anonymous wrote:The four boys have three different last names, but two of them (the first and third) have the same last name as their mother...Seems likely that each of the boys had a different father.
Anonymous wrote:But of course the father(s) get a free pass.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But of course the father(s) get a free pass.
EXACTLY. Why have none of the fathers been arrested for not being home with their kid(s)?
Anonymous wrote:But of course the father(s) get a free pass.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The four boys have three different last names, but two of them (the first and third) have the same last name as their mother...Seems likely that each of the boys had a different father.
So fucking what????
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The four boys have three different last names, but two of them (the first and third) have the same last name as their mother...Seems likely that each of the boys had a different father.
So fucking what????