Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I never understand why people think public schools are more diverse than private schools. Our private school strives to have race, religious, and socio-economic diversity. Our public school pulls from kids who live around the school who are pretty much the same type of kids. No diversity at our public.
Same here.
It may be something you just can't generalize about. Our MCPS public is much more diverse than private choices near us. Roughly 40% white, 30% hispanic, 15% black, 15% asian. I don't know of local private schools with that profile, particularly for hispanic students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I never understand why people think public schools are more diverse than private schools. Our private school strives to have race, religious, and socio-economic diversity. Our public school pulls from kids who live around the school who are pretty much the same type of kids. No diversity at our public.
Same here.
Anonymous wrote:In all honestly, most kids can not only handle but can thrive in a 22 person class at K. So really most people go private either because they want to hold a spot for high school, or they just want a smaller, more exclusive, self selecting group to hang out with and they don't care about exposing their children to diversity.
Anonymous wrote:In all honestly, most kids can not only handle but can thrive in a 22 person class at K. So really most people go private either because they want to hold a spot for high school, or they just want a smaller, more exclusive, self selecting group to hang out with and they don't care about exposing their children to diversity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Less kids in the classroom. More teachers in the classroom. A more structured education. Recess daily, PE daily.
You mean fewer.
I had no idea that I could not post without my language being picked apart. I meant LESS. You may mean fewer. I still meant LESS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Less kids in the classroom. More teachers in the classroom. A more structured education. Recess daily, PE daily.
You mean fewer.
I had no idea that I could not post without my language being picked apart. I meant LESS. You may mean fewer. I still meant LESS.
FYI- http://oxforddictionaries.com/words/less-or-fewer
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Less kids in the classroom. More teachers in the classroom. A more structured education. Recess daily, PE daily.
You mean fewer.
I had no idea that I could not post without my language being picked apart. I meant LESS. You may mean fewer. I still meant LESS.
Anonymous wrote:20:32 So sad. It is jail.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Less kids in the classroom. More teachers in the classroom. A more structured education. Recess daily, PE daily.
You mean fewer.
Anonymous wrote:PP 21:17 again. So, the reason is smaller class to teacher ratio. In K he has a music, spanish, pe, science, 2 homeroom teachers with a class of 12, and great resources. It may not seem like a big deal, but public school in MC offers PE once a week, if you can imagine, and lunch must be gotten and finished in 20 minutes. My 5 year old does not eat anything in 20 minutes! His school has PE 3 times a week, recess twice daily and snacks during the day if needed, in addition to lunch. They understand that kids need to move to grow and learn. At least my child benefits greatly from this.
