Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:\Anonymous wrote:If his private persona was anything like his public persona, this is bound to be a relief to his family. The guy was a loudmouthed attack dog, who relished spreading lies and anarchy for the sake of self-promotion. Good riddance.
I am a big fat liberal - but you're a shitty person. Shame on you.
Yes, people who refuse to speak ill of someone who spewed hate and rage all over the political landscape are the good guys, you're probably right. Best to only attack the living and not speak ill of the dead.
Attack his politics, or methods, all you want - whether he's living or dead. Saying his death is a relief to his family, and saying "good riddance," makes you a shitty person. And the fact that you don't see that merely reinforces it.
Anonymous wrote:Who in the heck is Andrew Breitbart?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:he help get rid of the acorn scam
ACORN helped people. Who did Andrew Breitbart help?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:\Anonymous wrote:If his private persona was anything like his public persona, this is bound to be a relief to his family. The guy was a loudmouthed attack dog, who relished spreading lies and anarchy for the sake of self-promotion. Good riddance.
I am a big fat liberal - but you're a shitty person. Shame on you.
Yes, people who refuse to speak ill of someone who spewed hate and rage all over the political landscape are the good guys, you're probably right. Best to only attack the living and not speak ill of the dead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:\Anonymous wrote:If his private persona was anything like his public persona, this is bound to be a relief to his family. The guy was a loudmouthed attack dog, who relished spreading lies and anarchy for the sake of self-promotion. Good riddance.
I am a big fat liberal - but you're a shitty person. Shame on you.
Yes, people who refuse to speak ill of someone who spewed hate and rage all over the political landscape are the good guys, you're probably right. Best to only attack the living and not speak ill of the dead.
No. You are just angry because he isn't Al Sharpton or some other liberal attack dog. WHat he did was part of the political process. Love it or hate it that's what happens in an open free society. That doesn't make him a "bad" person. Except that liberals are so intolerant they can't see through their own opaque eyes.
Anonymous wrote:he help get rid of the acorn scam
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:\Anonymous wrote:If his private persona was anything like his public persona, this is bound to be a relief to his family. The guy was a loudmouthed attack dog, who relished spreading lies and anarchy for the sake of self-promotion. Good riddance.
I am a big fat liberal - but you're a shitty person. Shame on you.
Yes, people who refuse to speak ill of someone who spewed hate and rage all over the political landscape are the good guys, you're probably right. Best to only attack the living and not speak ill of the dead.
Anonymous wrote:\Anonymous wrote:If his private persona was anything like his public persona, this is bound to be a relief to his family. The guy was a loudmouthed attack dog, who relished spreading lies and anarchy for the sake of self-promotion. Good riddance.
I am a big fat liberal - but you're a shitty person. Shame on you.
\Anonymous wrote:If his private persona was anything like his public persona, this is bound to be a relief to his family. The guy was a loudmouthed attack dog, who relished spreading lies and anarchy for the sake of self-promotion. Good riddance.