Anonymous wrote:Depends on your reason for SAH. What are you trying to do for your child, or prevent your child from doing? Personally, I've never SAH but if I had to say when, I'd say when they were all in full day school.
Anonymous wrote:"Getting kids to activities is hard even if you SAH. The only way to ease this is limiting who does what during which season."
Gotta get those snowflakes to their important activities!
Anonymous wrote:As kids get older than can also voice their desire for the time with you, which increases the guilt. After care makes or a very long day at school. Getting kids to extracurricular activities and events is hard if you're working full time during elementary school. I would guess if you could swing it taking time off during the 0-3 years and then working an 8am-3pm, 35 hour week would be perfect. It is nice to be able to spend time on the playground, playing before dinner, etc.
Anonymous wrote:I have a year-old son and am considering stay at home with him for about a couple years, and then would return to work full-time. I could do this at any point in the next 4-5 years (I don't see much of a reason to take time off once he's in kindergarten), and am leaning toward taking off from about 18 months - 3 years. I'd like to hear the opinions of other moms on when you think the best "window" of time is to take off, in terms of when you think the child benefits most (and any other factors that you think are relevant, like it's easier to get out and about at a certain age, so you recommend that particular age.....).
Thanks in advance for your advice. Would appreciate to hear most from moms who have done this before.
Anonymous wrote:I understand that not every job/field has flexibility but man, sure seems like a waste to quit a job you love that earns good money when kids are away from the house 35 hours a week between school and activities. I know you can't always pick the hours you work but I hope as technology advances and traffic gets worse and office space gets more expensive etc. we change the way we view work in this country. All those talented women sitting home because they can't find a situation that lets them have some time with their kids in the late afternoons. What a waste. And I don't mean that every SAHM with kids in school sits at home, I'm just trying to illustrate a point that some women probably would like to work if they could find some flexibility.
I also think that if both parents compromise if possible it is ideal. I have found I don't ALWAYS need to be the one who is around for my kids - if DH is there that is great for them and him. So I hope that we can tag-team when the kids are older so that someone is there for them after school/activities and yet we can both keep our jobs. I think we will need the money and the fulfillment aspect.
I know several moms that chose to stay at home once the kids were out of the house for a full 6.5 hours each day. I always found it odd that they worked from 7am-6:30pm--with full-time nanny for the first 5 years, but then once the kids hit school it was about spending time with them. Ironic.