Anonymous wrote:so an ultrasound is more invasive than sucking your baby's head out and then chopping it up? lol. why not help the consent process by showing the moms the life they are about to take? show the heartbeat ...
I thought this at first but then I realized a vaginal probe is not needed to determine gestational age. Do you think women walk into these clinics like they are just going in for mani/pedi? No, vaginal ultrasound is not more invasive then the actual procedure but it adds insult to injury and is not necessary. The purposes and intent of this law is purely designed to inflict intentional emotional distress, would you like to hear the heart beat, no, she would not like to hear the heart beat, in fact I'm willing to bet she doesn't want to even be there in the first place. Furthermore, it represents one step in government regulated health care and I do not mean providing insurance I mean these total idiots - and I mean all if them not just one party or the other but all- are one step closer in being able to tell what you can and cannot due when it comes to your health, medical care and body this perhaps, is the scariest part of all.