Anonymous wrote:I bet the camp is sold as an enrichment camp.
I know (from the way my DD learns) that prep would have improved her score. But, she was admitted to AAP a couple of years ago, and yesterday brought home another good report card, with all A's except for math (B).
Anonymous wrote:A 4 week prep course???? For real? When people were talking about prepping, I thought they meant those books that you can buy (Critical Thinking Company or whatever). I had no idea people were actually sending their kids to a course. that's crazy!
Anonymous wrote:I'm disappointed my DC missed the pool by a few points (looks like by just one or two questions - ugh!! - and my child came home that day and told me the test was easy; I think DC didn't read through all the answers carefully & just picked the first one that looked good without looking at all possible choices - which is not terribly surprising for a 1st-grader who has never taken any type of standardized test before).
Anyway, having an in-pool score would have alleviated a lot of the stress next year so I know I will be on pins & needles waiting for CogAT scores next Jan. I'm not doing anything now, but I do have the WISC in the back of my mind.
Curious if folks are already planning for a WISC, planning to prep for CogAT next year, or thinking about anything else re this process if your DC did not test into the pool on the NNAT. (Flame away if you must!)
Anonymous wrote:My child got a very "average" score on the NNAT. Shocking, but it is what it is. The world has not ceased to exist. DC is doing very well, so we'll see how things progress. I like the center school much better than our base school but that is not likely to be an option for us. If it seems that DC is not being challenged, I'll reevaluate and have DC retested. AS much as I think the center would have been good for DC, I can't make it my life's calling to get him in there.
My DC got 135 (41/4 and it was still 99% for his age. I wouldn't be surprised if the pool cutoff is higher than 132 next year - does anyone know what the highest pool cutoff has been?
It seems that one or two questions off combined with age differences could mean making the pool or not. I'm not sure for what range I would start considering the Wisc, it really depends on the child and all the other factors. We didn't prep but did mention that he would be takign a test that day and that he should try his best - and that there might not be a lot of time for all the questions.
Anonymous wrote:That is a good question. What was the lowest score that was 98 percent? I think 138 or 139 was the lowest of the 99 percent. Anyone?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The GBRS is not based at all on a child's test scores. It is based on what behaviors the teacher sees in the classroom.
I would wait. A child who is just a couple points outside of the pool should still be in the 98th percentile, and could very likely get in without the need for a WISC. And if you are already set on the WISC, wait until second grade. The committee wants the testing to be recent, and if they see that you jumped the gun and had your child take the WISC in 1st grade they might think you're a bit nutty.
You really have no idea what goes on in the thinking process of the evaluator. I know the local committee (teacher, AART, principal) has the kid's whole file in front of them when they assign the GBRS, and human nature would suggest that a kid whose file contains a CogAt composite of 107 will be evaluated differently than a kid whose composite is 140. And I have to decide whether to include WISC scores in the file BEFORE I know my kid's CogAt composite.