Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't choose QO over Wootton because of the answers to all of the questions posed by 12:52. QO is a fine school, but Wootton is better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We really like WJ. I think it is a bit more solid academically, yet more well rounded than Whitman or Churchill.
What does that mean? Why more solid academically than Whitman and Churchill? While not the only measure that's not what the test scores show. And well rounded? Whitman has solid athletics (certainly as good as WJ, not as good as Wootton), excellent debate, drama, music, newspaper, etc. Kids can get involved in whatever activities they want to be well rounded.
PP here. I should clarify. I meant to say that I think WJ is stronger academically than Quince Orchard and more well-rounded than Whitman and Churchill. I did not mean to suggest it was better academically than Whitman, and I really don't know if WJ is better or worse academically than Churchill.
QO is much better academically than WJ.
Really? Why would you sat that? Based on what?
Test score. Reputation. Housing price. What is your argument? Btw, I lives in QO area, will be thrilled if you are right. Just don't quite believe it.
Why would you say WJ is better?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We really like WJ. I think it is a bit more solid academically, yet more well rounded than Whitman or Churchill.
What does that mean? Why more solid academically than Whitman and Churchill? While not the only measure that's not what the test scores show. And well rounded? Whitman has solid athletics (certainly as good as WJ, not as good as Wootton), excellent debate, drama, music, newspaper, etc. Kids can get involved in whatever activities they want to be well rounded.
PP here. I should clarify. I meant to say that I think WJ is stronger academically than Quince Orchard and more well-rounded than Whitman and Churchill. I did not mean to suggest it was better academically than Whitman, and I really don't know if WJ is better or worse academically than Churchill.
QO is much better academically than WJ.
Really? Why would you sat that? Based on what?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We really like WJ. I think it is a bit more solid academically, yet more well rounded than Whitman or Churchill.
What does that mean? Why more solid academically than Whitman and Churchill? While not the only measure that's not what the test scores show. And well rounded? Whitman has solid athletics (certainly as good as WJ, not as good as Wootton), excellent debate, drama, music, newspaper, etc. Kids can get involved in whatever activities they want to be well rounded.
PP here. I should clarify. I meant to say that I think WJ is stronger academically than Quince Orchard and more well-rounded than Whitman and Churchill. I did not mean to suggest it was better academically than Whitman, and I really don't know if WJ is better or worse academically than Churchill.
QO is much better academically than WJ.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We really like WJ. I think it is a bit more solid academically, yet more well rounded than Whitman or Churchill.
What does that mean? Why more solid academically than Whitman and Churchill? While not the only measure that's not what the test scores show. And well rounded? Whitman has solid athletics (certainly as good as WJ, not as good as Wootton), excellent debate, drama, music, newspaper, etc. Kids can get involved in whatever activities they want to be well rounded.
PP here. I should clarify. I meant to say that I think WJ is stronger academically than Quince Orchard and more well-rounded than Whitman and Churchill. I did not mean to suggest it was better academically than Whitman, and I really don't know if WJ is better or worse academically than Churchill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We really like WJ. I think it is a bit more solid academically, yet more well rounded than Whitman or Churchill.
What does that mean? Why more solid academically than Whitman and Churchill? While not the only measure that's not what the test scores show. And well rounded? Whitman has solid athletics (certainly as good as WJ, not as good as Wootton), excellent debate, drama, music, newspaper, etc. Kids can get involved in whatever activities they want to be well rounded.
Anonymous wrote:We really like WJ. I think it is a bit more solid academically, yet more well rounded than Whitman or Churchill.