Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with OP. Parker's arguments are just wrong. It was Komen who bowed to anti-choice pressure. Pro choice citizens found out, and rightly discerned that it was a political move. I don't think that people have been forced to be "left" on this issue, quite the contrary. As an example I give you the recent anti choice initiative in VA requiring an ultrasound prior to an abortion whether it's medically called for or not. Further, I give you the pharmacists who have been granted "conscience clauses" not to dispense birth control. These are not the actions of a nation being forced to be politically liberal.
This is so infuriating. A pharmacist can now refuse to dispense birth control because he or she doesn't believe in using it, per the Bible.![]()
Come on ladies, how do we stop this madness?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with OP. Parker's arguments are just wrong. It was Komen who bowed to anti-choice pressure. Pro choice citizens found out, and rightly discerned that it was a political move. I don't think that people have been forced to be "left" on this issue, quite the contrary. As an example I give you the recent anti choice initiative in VA requiring an ultrasound prior to an abortion whether it's medically called for or not. Further, I give you the pharmacists who have been granted "conscience clauses" not to dispense birth control. These are not the actions of a nation being forced to be politically liberal.
Is this in VA?
Anonymous wrote:Agree with OP. Parker's arguments are just wrong. It was Komen who bowed to anti-choice pressure. Pro choice citizens found out, and rightly discerned that it was a political move. I don't think that people have been forced to be "left" on this issue, quite the contrary. As an example I give you the recent anti choice initiative in VA requiring an ultrasound prior to an abortion whether it's medically called for or not. Further, I give you the pharmacists who have been granted "conscience clauses" not to dispense birth control. These are not the actions of a nation being forced to be politically liberal.
Anonymous wrote:Agree with OP. Parker's arguments are just wrong. It was Komen who bowed to anti-choice pressure. Pro choice citizens found out, and rightly discerned that it was a political move. I don't think that people have been forced to be "left" on this issue, quite the contrary. As an example I give you the recent anti choice initiative in VA requiring an ultrasound prior to an abortion whether it's medically called for or not. Further, I give you the pharmacists who have been granted "conscience clauses" not to dispense birth control. These are not the actions of a nation being forced to be politically liberal.
Anonymous wrote:Actually thought it was extremely thoughtful..and I agree with her. Not sorry..sick of the left pressuring people to be left. If you don't like Komen ..give elsewhere..that's fine. Awful that they gave in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I usually like Kathleen Parker despite being a liberal, but she really twisted herself into a pretzel with this one.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/komen-catholics-and-the-cost-of-conscience/2012/02/03/gIQAqSGYnQ_story.html?hpid=z2
My favorite is the third graf, which is laugh-out-loud hilarious.
Kathleen Parker is a self-professed Republican. She has described herself as "right of center."