Anonymous
02/05/2012 23:31
Subject: Re:Romney: 'I'm Not Concerned About the Very Poor'
Anonymous wrote:How about it we lower the minimum wageAnonymous wrote:I am glad he said it, maybe the free loaders will realize their free ride is coming to an end.
More middle class poeple have more problems than the bottom feeders
Great, punish the people who are working.
Anonymous
02/04/2012 22:34
Subject: Re:Romney: 'I'm Not Concerned About the Very Poor'
How about it we lower the minimum wageAnonymous wrote:I am glad he said it, maybe the free loaders will realize their free ride is coming to an end.
More middle class poeple have more problems than the bottom feeders
takoma
02/04/2012 12:36
Subject: Re:Romney: 'I'm Not Concerned About the Very Poor'
TheManWithAUsername wrote:takoma wrote:If you were parodying Romney's callousness, I apologize for misunderstanding.
Again this problem rears its head. Are we approaching the sad day when we'll all have to use winking smileys?
And BTW, are you ready yet to retract your statement that it's equally hard to tell when a leftist statement is ironic?
Nope. I always stand by my lying attempts to be fair and balanced.
Anonymous
02/04/2012 11:18
Subject: Romney: 'I'm Not Concerned About the Very Poor'
Anonymous wrote:Did you read the entire quote? I'm not a Republican by any means, but the entire quote, in context, is hardly as draconian as its being portrayed.
Agree.
It was perfect fodder for making a headline though. Rookie mistake.
TheManWithAUsername
02/04/2012 11:13
Subject: Re:Romney: 'I'm Not Concerned About the Very Poor'
takoma wrote:If you were parodying Romney's callousness, I apologize for misunderstanding.
Again this problem rears its head. Are we approaching the sad day when we'll all have to use winking smileys?
And BTW, are you ready yet to retract your statement that it's equally hard to tell when a leftist statement is ironic?