Anonymous wrote:What I read tonight was that Spear's attorney said that he offered to take a polygraph. Why would he do that if he were guilty? Are we forgetting that another MCPS teacher (Ronald Heller) was falsely accused of sexual contact with multiple students, who later admitted that they made it all up?
It is all too easy for teachers to be accused of wrongdoing and for their careers and lives to be ruined. People think that there needs to be a ton of evidence against someone in order for an arrest to be made, but that is not the case. It seems to me that the trend is toward 'guilty until proven innocent' anymore when it comes to allegations against teachers/coaches.
I would be the first one to say that it is wrong for an adult teacher/coach to have an inappropriate relationship with a student, but no longer do I automatically think that the adult in these cases is guilty and that the victim is telling the truth. We need to let the police do their job before we draw any conclusions.
Anonymous wrote:He's 47 years old.
Anonymous wrote:What I read tonight was that Spear's attorney said that he offered to take a polygraph. Why would he do that if he were guilty? Are we forgetting that another MCPS teacher (Ronald Heller) was falsely accused of sexual contact with multiple students, who later admitted that they made it all up?
It is all too easy for teachers to be accused of wrongdoing and for their careers and lives to be ruined. People think that there needs to be a ton of evidence against someone in order for an arrest to be made, but that is not the case. It seems to me that the trend is toward 'guilty until proven innocent' anymore when it comes to allegations against teachers/coaches.
I would be the first one to say that it is wrong for an adult teacher/coach to have an inappropriate relationship with a student, but no longer do I automatically think that the adult in these cases is guilty and that the victim is telling the truth. We need to let the police do their job before we draw any conclusions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Had he not been a coach/teacher no law would have been broken.
Not true. The student is a minor.
The girl must have been 15 at the time. 16 is legal in Maryland. But a 4th degree sex offense, which he is allegedly charged with, is with a minor who is 14 or 15 years old, with the defendant at least 4 years older.