No idea, maybe because that one was the last subtest and she tuned out? She got a high % correct on the ones she did attempt. I know, we could probably have told her to make sure all questions were answered

By +ve or -ve, I meant on the committee decision to find her eligible for AAP or not.

I agree with the prior poster that it will just based on the final number/score, they likely do not need to parse patterns related to how a particular score was achieved.

Anonymous wrote:My DC apparently did not attempt many questions (around 10 out of 52) in the CoGAT non-verbal, also left out a few unanswered in Quant. She just managed to make the pool with a 132 composite.

Not that it matters much at this point but purely out of curiosity, do things like these have any bearing (+ve or -ve) on the eligibility decision or is that decision just a numbers game, without consideration of how the score was arrived at?

Why did she attempt so few questions?

By +ve or -ve do you mean the score profile? For example, my dd's results state that she has a 9b q+ profile. Is that what you're referring to?