Anonymous wrote:People seem obsessed with this case and this school. Interesting. Yes, other people have sued other private schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.washingtonian.com/blogarticles/19428.html
http://washingtonexaminer.com/local/dc/2011/05/former-sidwell-psychologists-license-risk-over-affair
http://www.wjla.com/articles/2011/05/sidwell-friends-staffer-target-of-sexually-charged-lawsuit-60629.html
Would you please leave this shit alone? There's a little six year old girl in the middle of all this, for chrissakes, and the last thing she needs is someone stirring up the pot to get more people talking about her parents. Just leave it alone. Not cool at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most private school enrollment contracts bind the private school to only a very low duty of care, and no particular educational, social, or developmental goals are assured. We had DC enrolled at a well-known private school and became embroiled in a serious dispute with the head of school; the school declined to settle and refund our tuition unless we would execute a lifetime confidentiality agreement; they claim that this is their SOP. We also understand that almost every private school carries general liability insurance, with complete-defense coverage, such that the school itself effectively does not have to pay the costs of defense counsel. You have NO rights in a private school.
So you declined to settle because you would have to keep quiet about it? Why is agreeing to confidentiality a deal breaker if you get the settlement you want? I also don't follow the point about liability insurance...how does a school having liability insurance lead to families having no rights?
I think its pretty obvious why they didn't take the settlement. One of the things they wanted was the right to publicize the situation so why accept a settlement if you give that up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.washingtonian.com/blogarticles/19428.html
http://washingtonexaminer.com/local/dc/2011/05/former-sidwell-psychologists-license-risk-over-affair
http://www.wjla.com/articles/2011/05/sidwell-friends-staffer-target-of-sexually-charged-lawsuit-60629.html
Would you please leave this shit alone? There's a little six year old girl in the middle of all this, for chrissakes, and the last thing she needs is someone stirring up the pot to get more people talking about her parents. Just leave it alone. Not cool at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most private school enrollment contracts bind the private school to only a very low duty of care, and no particular educational, social, or developmental goals are assured. We had DC enrolled at a well-known private school and became embroiled in a serious dispute with the head of school; the school declined to settle and refund our tuition unless we would execute a lifetime confidentiality agreement; they claim that this is their SOP. We also understand that almost every private school carries general liability insurance, with complete-defense coverage, such that the school itself effectively does not have to pay the costs of defense counsel. You have NO rights in a private school.
So you declined to settle because you would have to keep quiet about it? Why is agreeing to confidentiality a deal breaker if you get the settlement you want? I also don't follow the point about liability insurance...how does a school having liability insurance lead to families having no rights?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.washingtonian.com/blogarticles/19428.html
http://washingtonexaminer.com/local/dc/2011/05/former-sidwell-psychologists-license-risk-over-affair
http://www.wjla.com/articles/2011/05/sidwell-friends-staffer-target-of-sexually-charged-lawsuit-60629.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.washingtonian.com/blogarticles/19428.html
http://washingtonexaminer.com/local/dc/2011/05/former-sidwell-psychologists-license-risk-over-affair
http://www.wjla.com/articles/2011/05/sidwell-friends-staffer-target-of-sexually-charged-lawsuit-60629.html
Anonymous wrote:http://www.washingtonian.com/blogarticles/19428.html
Anonymous wrote:If the school keeps passing a child along who is doing poorly, then I can see a case. There were cases filed like this against some public school systems. Since NCLB, there is less of that because the schools have to address poor performance.