Anonymous wrote:I hoe people who want to cut the number of federal employees realize hat those emloyees will be related by contractors. He government will not get smaller. The owners of the companies will, however, get richet. Hat is hy here are more millionaires in this area -- gvenmen contracts.
The Senator who wants to ge rid of the TSA has a company in his district that wants to get the contract to do the work. That company will hire all of the TSA agents, chage he government alot and panhe workers less than what they would get as government emloyees.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:we need defense and social security. we can do without all the rest and thats what is going to happen. do the math.
Everybody has their version of what is necessary. Your parents want medicare. Your tea party friend wants immigration control. Your wife wants to know that someone is checking children's toys for lead paint. And the response to the next natural disaster had better be good. And when you add it all up, you are back to the current size of the federal government.
Anonymous wrote:we need defense and social security. we can do without all the rest and thats what is going to happen. do the math.
Anonymous wrote:As a former federal employee, I agree with the poster who said we should cut every third worker. At my former agency they would not have been missed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Public workers have it good. A strong union, very little chance of job loss, great benefits. Private sector cant find jobs let alone a pay freeze yet Fedsworkers won't be asked to sacrifice like the rest of the economy. What hypocrisy.
No, you know who isn't being asked to sacrifice like the rest of the economy? It's not the feds. It's the investment banks that, after throwing the entire country under the bus, were rewarded with huge bailouts and astronomical end-of-year bonuses while millions of people were losing their jobs and homes, who got trillions (not billions, that's peanuts that actually makes news) in interest free loans from the government that they then turned around and lent back to it at 6% (but of course, restructuring homeowners' loans has always been out of the question because who wants to reward bad judgment?), who are now more powerful than they were before the financial crisis, and who are now just laughing at you stupid Main Streeter that they've succeeded in turning against the only people left who aren't out to screw you.
I was just looking at the gift giving section of the Wall Street Journal a couple of days ago: $20,000 shark-shaped cuff links, anyone?
How dare Americans be able to spend their money on what they so please. The government should ban expensive goods and services. You work for the government not Goldman Sachs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Public workers have it good. A strong union, very little chance of job loss, great benefits. Private sector cant find jobs let alone a pay freeze yet Fedsworkers won't be asked to sacrifice like the rest of the economy. What hypocrisy.
Not a Fed employee and I am not only in favor of a continued pay freeze, I think many govt. agencies could indiscriminately cut every third employee and the job could still be done. It seems to me, from DCUM, that women, in particular, only want to work for the Feds because they are "family friendkly" and they can take off whenever they feel like it, "work from home" while they run errands. The pay freeze should continue until unemployment is under 5% and the economy is rolling.
Anonymous wrote:OP, you are an idiot. I am a government attorney who works hard to be sure that you are not getting screwed by corporations. I work 50+ hour weeks and barely saw my family over the summer. At a firm, I could be making 3-4X what I am making now. I haven't had a raise in years and since healthcare premiums are going up for feds, I am essentially getting a pay decrease in 2012.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Public workers have it good. A strong union, very little chance of job loss, great benefits. Private sector cant find jobs let alone a pay freeze yet Fedsworkers won't be asked to sacrifice like the rest of the economy. What hypocrisy.
I believe a pay freeze has been in force for the federal workforce for at least a year. At least my friend who is in the FAA hasn't had an increase due to across-the-board freeze.
http://www.myfederalretirement.com/public/569.cfm
So, what, exactly, are you prattling on about?
Not OP, but this is odd - I heard federal pay was frozen too, but my best friend who works for Congress just received a substantial raise. Hmmm. Regardless, I do think that many federal employees, especially Hill employees, get paid very little considering the grueling hours they work.