Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only reason to have another child, in my humble opinion, is because you want one and your family does not feel complete. Not to take care of #1, not to provide a playmate for #1. That is a
recipe for disappointment on your end and resentment on the kid's.
Agree. It would be grossly unfair to have another child for these reasons.
Anonymous wrote:The only reason to have another child, in my humble opinion, is because you want one and your family does not feel complete. Not to take care of #1, not to provide a playmate for #1. That is a
recipe for disappointment on your end and resentment on the kid's.
Anonymous wrote:Your second child will be the world's worst sleeper, will hate vegetables, have a food allergy, be allergic to your cat, bite, only want to wear red, demand your constant attention, want Star Wars read to them every 30 minutes, be grumpy when they're tired, be a Daddy's girl/boy, and wish their big brother was never born 60% of the time. They will demand that you play with them when #1 is napping, get sick in the middle of the night, beg for horse lessons and roller skates, and want to take tae kwon do three times a week. If you still want a 2nd child knowing all that, then you should try to have one. If only a perfect child will do, then consider sticking with one.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. We would not have a second without getting genetic testing done so we are a long way away from having a serious conversation about a second one. But even if the genetics turn out ok, does that tell me everything I need to know? What if I had a second one and he/she turned out to be a jerk? I guess I'm saying that genetic testing will only get me so far in the decision, and I worry that because I have a special needs #1, I will expect #2 to be perfectly healthy which is a poor assumption to make. I may have a special needs #1, but I also have the world's best sleeper, happiest funniest little guy around. #2 could be perfectly healthy but not sleep through the night until he's 2!