Anonymous
Post 12/01/2011 15:26     Subject: Re:Gingrich? Really?
jsteele wrote:Ron Paul totally decimates Newt with this ad:



Wow, and he only covered the last ten years or so.
jsteele
Post 12/01/2011 15:08     Subject: Re:Gingrich? Really?
Ron Paul totally decimates Newt with this ad:

Anonymous
Post 11/30/2011 18:53     Subject: Gingrich? Really?
Anonymous wrote:9:51 You think people outside the beltway really follow what happens in Washington? Go online and read the local papers. If you are lucky, you will see Newt referred to as the former Speaker of the House and a quote from him about how the only person who is perfect is Jesus.


I read the St. Louis Post Dispatch and they cover these things there.
Anonymous
Post 11/30/2011 18:27     Subject: Gingrich? Really?
9:51 You think people outside the beltway really follow what happens in Washington? Go online and read the local papers. If you are lucky, you will see Newt referred to as the former Speaker of the House and a quote from him about how the only person who is perfect is Jesus.
Anonymous
Post 11/30/2011 17:59     Subject: Gingrich? Really?
Anonymous wrote:If we could see more mid-1990s Newt, the one that seemed to actually WANT to come up with solutions other than "MOAR WELFARE" and "MAKE THEM STARVE", this might be an interesting election. OTOH, he has to pretend to be a teabagger to win the nomination.


The mid-2000s Newt, the one who hung out at AEI and actually participated in a respectful way in their panels that us liberals have to attend for work purposes, actually seemed thoughtful. That Newt is buried pretty deeply beneath the teabagger pretense, though.
Anonymous
Post 11/30/2011 17:19     Subject: Gingrich? Really?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No one outside the beltway pays attention to that stuff. If the field clears up a little, he maybe able to win this thing.


Funny, I tend to agree with you. For all the blather about the "rough-hewn wisdom of the American people", we're really pretty dumb, easily manipulated, and superficial. Not to toot my own horn, but I predicted the winners of the last 5 presidential elections based on this extremely complex political strategy: "The Taller, More Charismatic Candidate Wins"

Clinton v Bush: Clinton
Clinton v Dole: Clinton
Gore v Bush: Bush (by a hair)
Bush v Kerry: Bush (forget who you want to have a beer with, Kerry looks like a haunted tree)
Obama v McCain: Puh-leeze! (unless you think its impossible for a black man to get the lead )

Anyone who thinks Obama v Newt will come out with Newt taking the oath of office on 1/20/13 is delusional.


True, its like a crack adict, America needs someone like Newt to get clean and move forward in life but they just arent ready to drop the crack pipe (dems). Maybe eventually when things get even worse will we drop the crack pipe and move all conservative.


Wow, Newt is your idea of clean? John Boehner didn't think so when he tried to oust him in 1997.
Anonymous
Post 11/30/2011 16:09     Subject: Gingrich? Really?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No one outside the beltway pays attention to that stuff. If the field clears up a little, he maybe able to win this thing.


Funny, I tend to agree with you. For all the blather about the "rough-hewn wisdom of the American people", we're really pretty dumb, easily manipulated, and superficial. Not to toot my own horn, but I predicted the winners of the last 5 presidential elections based on this extremely complex political strategy: "The Taller, More Charismatic Candidate Wins"

Clinton v Bush: Clinton
Clinton v Dole: Clinton
Gore v Bush: Bush (by a hair)
Bush v Kerry: Bush (forget who you want to have a beer with, Kerry looks like a haunted tree)
Obama v McCain: Puh-leeze! (unless you think its impossible for a black man to get the lead )

Anyone who thinks Obama v Newt will come out with Newt taking the oath of office on 1/20/13 is delusional.


True, its like a crack adict, America needs someone like Newt to get clean and move forward in life but they just arent ready to drop the crack pipe (dems). Maybe eventually when things get even worse will we drop the crack pipe and move all conservative.
Anonymous
Post 11/30/2011 15:33     Subject: Gingrich? Really?
Anonymous wrote:No one outside the beltway pays attention to that stuff. If the field clears up a little, he maybe able to win this thing.


Funny, I tend to agree with you. For all the blather about the "rough-hewn wisdom of the American people", we're really pretty dumb, easily manipulated, and superficial. Not to toot my own horn, but I predicted the winners of the last 5 presidential elections based on this extremely complex political strategy: "The Taller, More Charismatic Candidate Wins"

Clinton v Bush: Clinton
Clinton v Dole: Clinton
Gore v Bush: Bush (by a hair)
Bush v Kerry: Bush (forget who you want to have a beer with, Kerry looks like a haunted tree)
Obama v McCain: Puh-leeze! (unless you think its impossible for a black man to get the lead )

Anyone who thinks Obama v Newt will come out with Newt taking the oath of office on 1/20/13 is delusional.
Anonymous
Post 11/30/2011 15:19     Subject: Gingrich? Really?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/was-gingrich-a-lobbyist-he-sure-comes-off-that-way/2011/11/30/gIQASxd9CO_blog.html?hpid=z2

Written by a conservative, FWIW.

Nominate Newt. Please.
Anonymous
Post 11/30/2011 14:34     Subject: Gingrich? Really?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No one outside the beltway pays attention to that stuff. If the field clears up a little, he maybe able to win this thing.



Really? So americans don't care about ethics violations, infidelity, lobbying, flip flopping. They don't care whether or not they will be required to buy health insurance, and they could go either way on environmental issues.

Is there a gas leak at your house? Something is making you woozy.


You described obama and every politician


Really? Obama is all of those things? The gas must still be on.
Anonymous
Post 11/30/2011 13:59     Subject: Gingrich? Really?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No one outside the beltway pays attention to that stuff. If the field clears up a little, he maybe able to win this thing.



Really? So americans don't care about ethics violations, infidelity, lobbying, flip flopping. They don't care whether or not they will be required to buy health insurance, and they could go either way on environmental issues.

Is there a gas leak at your house? Something is making you woozy.


You described obama and every politician
Anonymous
Post 11/30/2011 13:58     Subject: Gingrich? Really?
Anonymous wrote:No one outside the beltway pays attention to that stuff. If the field clears up a little, he maybe able to win this thing.



Really? So americans don't care about ethics violations, infidelity, lobbying, flip flopping. They don't care whether or not they will be required to buy health insurance, and they could go either way on environmental issues.

Is there a gas leak at your house? Something is making you woozy.
Anonymous
Post 11/30/2011 10:26     Subject: Gingrich? Really?
Anonymous wrote:No newts the one. He is just so smart...


Newt wins by default. He's not black. He's not a member of some Satanic pseudo-Christian splinter-sect. He's not a dumber doppleganger of George W Bush. He's not a woman.

Didn't think the GOP could manage to cock-up their chances at winning the White House in 2012, but they managed to find someone less electable than John McCain. Good for the country, though.

USA! USA! USA!
Anonymous
Post 11/30/2011 10:24     Subject: Gingrich? Really?
Anonymous wrote:He is just so smart, and his answers to questions reflect deep thinking about the issues over decades. They are not just memorized responses like all of the other candidates (including Romney and of course Obama) have. I could vote for him -- too bad about all of the personal baggage that will probably derail his candidacy. And somebody really needs to do something about his wife's helmet hairdo.


Like Paul Ryan, Newt Gingrich is what a stupid person's idea of a smart person looks and sounds like.
Anonymous
Post 11/30/2011 09:51     Subject: Re:Gingrich? Really?
PP - are you stoned?