Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't like it..
Don't mean to be snarky, but maybe you could find a ring for half the price (or less) which is still pretty extravagant and give $4000 to a family in dc that are hungry. I bet it would feed them for 6-9 months. I'm sure you already give a lot to charity and I realize that we can't fix all the problems that are out there, but I think 8200 is crazy for a ring. What if you lose it? Also, I'm sure there are lots of nice rjings for 3000-4000 or less. Maybe do something personal, like buy groceries for some kids or fund a medical procedure or fund part of your private school or send a kid to college for a semester. I know it's your money and you earned it and you can spend it as you like, but in these times of such economic need (when people are protesting on the streets) I think a less expensive ring and a generous donation would make you feel really good.
Don't like the ring either but this poster is way over the top. Are you same poster that every single time someone talks about spending money the answer is always donate it to charity?
Anonymous wrote:OP, this is your lucky day. First, I echo what everyone else has said about your pick -- not very attractive for the price. If you are willing to drop some cash, however, please see this link with 50 "engagement" rings from Lucky maagzine: http://www.luckymag.com/blogs/luckyrightnow/2011/10/engagement-rings#slide=1
Very few of these are traditional engagement rings and most could be a statement ring. Most are cheaper and a million times more attractive than your pick.
Anonymous wrote:P.S. The donate to a needy family person should get off of their high horse. Maybe this woman has plenty to buy herself a nice gift AND donate to causes she believes in. It's not always either/or you know.