Anonymous
11/17/2011 12:32
Subject: s/o Redraft the 14th Amendment to Fix the "Anchor Baby" Issue
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add in that birth right can only occur if at least 1 parent is a citizen.
I will sign it and get some illegals who can't read english to sign it too.
This is not fair.
You're only saying this because your parents are American.
I've been here for 15 years and have no interest in becoming an American. OTOH, my child was born here and raised in your soil. I pay taxes and US is my child's home. Why do you think he should not be considered American? What is he then?
Why do you have no interest in being american? Are you not here for a better life? Again this is an example of wanting free shit but not being part of the society that offers these benefits and ideals.
Free? I pay more taxes and have lower salaries than an American doing the same job. I have a life as good as I had back home. I don't intend to stay here any longer than needed so that's why I have no interest in giving up my citizenship to become American.
Anonymous
11/17/2011 12:30
Subject: s/o Redraft the 14th Amendment to Fix the "Anchor Baby" Issue
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add in that birth right can only occur if at least 1 parent is a citizen.
I will sign it and get some illegals who can't read english to sign it too.
Why not just have one parent be a legal permanent resident? You do realize how long it takes to become a citizen, even when you are here legally?
Aha, OP here, I am happy to see someone else noticed the flaw in this proposal. Also what would be the status of all those children on green card holders. Would they just get green cards, which as you know is a residency permit not an entry permit - or woud you create a new category just for them.
12:07 here. As I mentioned to another pp, a special provision could be put in place:
Minor children whose parents entered the US legally and hold continual legal status, would automatically be granted US citizenship at age 18.
Ok, that could work, but what happens if a parent commits a crime and get deported (green card holders can be deported) before the child turns 18. Also, would these children be eligible for the presidency? Would you reinterpret the meaning to "natural-born citizen".
No they wouldn't, until the age of 18 the parents are responsible for the children and it is under their actions. They shouldn't commit a crime while being a green card holder knowing that it will revoke their kid's ability to become a citizen. Why is it ok for permanent residence to commit a crime and not get deported? they should be on their best behavior.
Anonymous
11/17/2011 12:28
Subject: s/o Redraft the 14th Amendment to Fix the "Anchor Baby" Issue
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP, you need to follow instructions, you need to redraft the entire paragraph - I need to see words on the screen.
You can do that for me. My forte is logical operations and systems design.
<Snort> All evidence to the contrary.
giving free shit away without the the parent's paying into the system is NOT logical. You can't bleed out more than you take in especially with poverity income and benifit disbursements. The parent's have no intention of getting out of poverty nor can they because they are illegal so everyone else is paying to raise them. Our welfare and low income system wasn't designed to take this type of load, it will need to be redesigned if illegals continue to be supported in this manor.
I'd add that you guys should have your citizenship revoked if a foreigner spotted bad grammar or orthography when you write in your own language.
Not all of us give a shit about grammar and writing, most of the newer generation (Who is taking all the high tech jobs) don't need that. So jokes on you . We'll be done with our work while you old farts are still proofreading the first email reply you read 4 hours a go.
Anonymous
11/17/2011 12:26
Subject: Re:s/o Redraft the 14th Amendment to Fix the "Anchor Baby" Issue
-He would become an American if and when you decide to do the same or at age 18, he would become a US citizen. (There could be a special provision that minor children whose parents entered the US legally and hold continual legal status, would automatically be granted US citizenship at age 18.)
Why would you wait until the child is 18 to grant citizenship? It doesn't make sense to me at all.
Anonymous
11/17/2011 12:26
Subject: s/o Redraft the 14th Amendment to Fix the "Anchor Baby" Issue
Thanks for the responses.
I have no desire to become American because I was born and raised elsewhere and live here just due to the circumstances. I do want to go back one day and don't want my child to be forced to live somewhere which is not their home.
Also, the fact that I have to give up my citizenship from my country of origin is a huge turn off. I don't mind being sent home if you guys declare war against us but I'd die if I was not allowed back home for such reason.
It's funny how you're forcing my citizenship on my child when he has never been there for more than 3 months in his entire life. My child is American. Born and raised here. You like it or not.
If this "law" was in place a few decades back would your parents or grandparents be impacted or they were all native americans?
I have no desire to become American because I was born and raised elsewhere and live here just due to the circumstances. I do want to go back one day and don't want my child to be forced to live somewhere which is not their home.
Also, the fact that I have to give up my citizenship from my country of origin is a huge turn off. I don't mind being sent home if you guys declare war against us but I'd die if I was not allowed back home for such reason.
It's funny how you're forcing my citizenship on my child when he has never been there for more than 3 months in his entire life. My child is American. Born and raised here. You like it or not.
If this "law" was in place a few decades back would your parents or grandparents be impacted or they were all native americans?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Answer my questions and I'll be pleased to answer yours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add in that birth right can only occur if at least 1 parent is a citizen.
I will sign it and get some illegals who can't read english to sign it too.
This is not fair.
You're only saying this because your parents are American.
I've been here for 15 years and have no interest in becoming an American. OTOH, my child was born here and raised in your soil. I pay taxes and US is my child's home. Why do you think he should not be considered American? What is he then?
Why do you live here, but have no desire to become a citizen (I'm assuming that's what you mean by "becoming an American")? And why would you want your child to be one?
-Your child would be classified as a citizen of whatever country you are from.
-He would become an American if and when you decide to do the same or at age 18, he would become a US citizen. (There could be a special provision that minor children whose parents entered the US legally and hold continual legal status, would automatically be granted US citizenship at age 18.)
Anonymous
11/17/2011 12:26
Subject: s/o Redraft the 14th Amendment to Fix the "Anchor Baby" Issue
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add in that birth right can only occur if at least 1 parent is a citizen.
I will sign it and get some illegals who can't read english to sign it too.
This is not fair.
You're only saying this because your parents are American.
I've been here for 15 years and have no interest in becoming an American. OTOH, my child was born here and raised in your soil. I pay taxes and US is my child's home. Why do you think he should not be considered American? What is he then?
Why do you have no interest in being american? Are you not here for a better life? Again this is an example of wanting free shit but not being part of the society that offers these benefits and ideals.
Anonymous
11/17/2011 12:23
Subject: s/o Redraft the 14th Amendment to Fix the "Anchor Baby" Issue
Anonymous wrote:We need to rewrite our Constitution for a bullshit fox news phrase?
You fail, by mentioning fox news. You have been outed as libtarded
Anonymous
11/17/2011 12:22
Subject: s/o Redraft the 14th Amendment to Fix the "Anchor Baby" Issue
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP, you need to follow instructions, you need to redraft the entire paragraph - I need to see words on the screen.
You can do that for me. My forte is logical operations and systems design.
<Snort> All evidence to the contrary.
giving free shit away without the the parent's paying into the system is NOT logical. You can't bleed out more than you take in especially with poverity income and benifit disbursements. The parent's have no intention of getting out of poverty nor can they because they are illegal so everyone else is paying to raise them. Our welfare and low income system wasn't designed to take this type of load, it will need to be redesigned if illegals continue to be supported in this manor.
It's apparent from your post that if nothing else, our educational system needs to be redesigned. For starters, the proper use of apostrophes and the difference between manor and manner. I'll give you a pass on the misspellings - those can happen to anyone, especially those who have an incomplete grasp of the language in the first place. Holy shit.
this is an anonymouse forum on the internet made for speed. Are you an idiot tech-tarded boomer that thinks each post needs to be proofread and a masterpiece of literature? You're doing it wrong! GTFO, STFU, LOL that's how you use the internet.
FUCK YOU asshole, my assistants write reports for me
Anonymous
11/17/2011 12:20
Subject: s/o Redraft the 14th Amendment to Fix the "Anchor Baby" Issue
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP, you need to follow instructions, you need to redraft the entire paragraph - I need to see words on the screen.
You can do that for me. My forte is logical operations and systems design.
<Snort> All evidence to the contrary.
giving free shit away without the the parent's paying into the system is NOT logical. You can't bleed out more than you take in especially with poverity income and benifit disbursements. The parent's have no intention of getting out of poverty nor can they because they are illegal so everyone else is paying to raise them. Our welfare and low income system wasn't designed to take this type of load, it will need to be redesigned if illegals continue to be supported in this manor.
It's apparent from your post that if nothing else, our educational system needs to be redesigned. For starters, the proper use of apostrophes and the difference between manor and manner. I'll give you a pass on the misspellings - those can happen to anyone, especially those who have an incomplete grasp of the language in the first place. Holy shit.
FUCK YOU asshole, my assistants write reports for me
Anonymous
11/17/2011 12:18
Subject: s/o Redraft the 14th Amendment to Fix the "Anchor Baby" Issue
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add in that birth right can only occur if at least 1 parent is a citizen.
I will sign it and get some illegals who can't read english to sign it too.
Why not just have one parent be a legal permanent resident? You do realize how long it takes to become a citizen, even when you are here legally?
Aha, OP here, I am happy to see someone else noticed the flaw in this proposal. Also what would be the status of all those children on green card holders. Would they just get green cards, which as you know is a residency permit not an entry permit - or woud you create a new category just for them.
12:07 here. As I mentioned to another pp, a special provision could be put in place:
Minor children whose parents entered the US legally and hold continual legal status, would automatically be granted US citizenship at age 18.
Ok, that could work, but what happens if a parent commits a crime and get deported (green card holders can be deported) before the child turns 18. Also, would these children be eligible for the presidency? Would you reinterpret the meaning to "natural-born citizen".
Anonymous
11/17/2011 12:12
Subject: s/o Redraft the 14th Amendment to Fix the "Anchor Baby" Issue
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add in that birth right can only occur if at least 1 parent is a citizen.
I will sign it and get some illegals who can't read english to sign it too.
Why not just have one parent be a legal permanent resident? You do realize how long it takes to become a citizen, even when you are here legally?
Aha, OP here, I am happy to see someone else noticed the flaw in this proposal. Also what would be the status of all those children on green card holders. Would they just get green cards, which as you know is a residency permit not an entry permit - or woud you create a new category just for them.
12:07 here. As I mentioned to another pp, a special provision could be put in place:
Minor children whose parents entered the US legally and hold continual legal status, would automatically be granted US citizenship at age 18.
Anonymous
11/17/2011 12:07
Subject: s/o Redraft the 14th Amendment to Fix the "Anchor Baby" Issue
Anonymous wrote:Answer my questions and I'll be pleased to answer yours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add in that birth right can only occur if at least 1 parent is a citizen.
I will sign it and get some illegals who can't read english to sign it too.
This is not fair.
You're only saying this because your parents are American.
I've been here for 15 years and have no interest in becoming an American. OTOH, my child was born here and raised in your soil. I pay taxes and US is my child's home. Why do you think he should not be considered American? What is he then?
Why do you live here, but have no desire to become a citizen (I'm assuming that's what you mean by "becoming an American")? And why would you want your child to be one?
-Your child would be classified as a citizen of whatever country you are from.
-He would become an American if and when you decide to do the same or at age 18, he would become a US citizen. (There could be a special provision that minor children whose parents entered the US legally and hold continual legal status, would automatically be granted US citizenship at age 18.)
Anonymous
11/17/2011 12:00
Subject: s/o Redraft the 14th Amendment to Fix the "Anchor Baby" Issue
Answer my questions and I'll be pleased to answer yours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add in that birth right can only occur if at least 1 parent is a citizen.
I will sign it and get some illegals who can't read english to sign it too.
This is not fair.
You're only saying this because your parents are American.
I've been here for 15 years and have no interest in becoming an American. OTOH, my child was born here and raised in your soil. I pay taxes and US is my child's home. Why do you think he should not be considered American? What is he then?
Why do you live here, but have no desire to become a citizen (I'm assuming that's what you mean by "becoming an American")? And why would you want your child to be one?
Anonymous
11/17/2011 12:00
Subject: s/o Redraft the 14th Amendment to Fix the "Anchor Baby" Issue
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add in that birth right can only occur if at least 1 parent is a citizen.
I will sign it and get some illegals who can't read english to sign it too.
Why not just have one parent be a legal permanent resident? You do realize how long it takes to become a citizen, even when you are here legally?
Aha, OP here, I am happy to see someone else noticed the flaw in this proposal. Also what would be the status of all those children on green card holders. Would they just get green cards, which as you know is a residency permit not an entry permit - or woud you create a new category just for them.
Anonymous
11/17/2011 12:00
Subject: s/o Redraft the 14th Amendment to Fix the "Anchor Baby" Issue
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP, you need to follow instructions, you need to redraft the entire paragraph - I need to see words on the screen.
You can do that for me. My forte is logical operations and systems design.
<Snort> All evidence to the contrary.
giving free shit away without the the parent's paying into the system is NOT logical. You can't bleed out more than you take in especially with poverity income and benifit disbursements. The parent's have no intention of getting out of poverty nor can they because they are illegal so everyone else is paying to raise them. Our welfare and low income system wasn't designed to take this type of load, it will need to be redesigned if illegals continue to be supported in this manor.
It's apparent from your post that if nothing else, our educational system needs to be redesigned. For starters, the proper use of apostrophes and the difference between manor and manner. I'll give you a pass on the misspellings - those can happen to anyone, especially those who have an incomplete grasp of the language in the first place. Holy shit.