Anonymous
11/15/2011 19:44
Subject: Sandusky interview
Anonymous wrote:I'm the person who in another thread compared him to Michael Jackson. In various interviews Sandusky describes himself as a kid who never grew up. Michael Jackson is definitely a Peter Pan. They both LOVED kids with all their heart and seemed like they would never hurt a fly and I think both of them lived in denial and believe(d) the lies they tell/told.
That is funny, I never thought that MJ was guilty. Insecure, yes, but not guilty.
Anonymous
11/15/2011 19:29
Subject: Re:Sandusky interview
Anonymous wrote:Lawyer here. Have to correct a PP: the evidence in a criminal case must be "beyond a reasonable doubt" NOT "clear and convincinc." That's a civil standard.
Actually I think the poster was (incorrectly?) referring to the proof required to indict, as the grand jury did. The standard for the grand jury is certainly less that BRD, but my criminal procedure fails me as to the correct answer.
Anonymous
11/15/2011 19:05
Subject: Sandusky interview
Anonymous wrote:I'm the person who in another thread compared him to Michael Jackson. In various interviews Sandusky describes himself as a kid who never grew up. Michael Jackson is definitely a Peter Pan. They both LOVED kids with all their heart and seemed like they would never hurt a fly and I think both of them lived in denial and believe(d) the lies they tell/told.
+1
Anonymous
11/15/2011 13:50
Subject: Re:Sandusky interview
Lawyer here. Have to correct a PP: the evidence in a criminal case must be "beyond a reasonable doubt" NOT "clear and convincinc." That's a civil standard.
Anonymous
11/15/2011 11:18
Subject: Sandusky interview
I'm the person who in another thread compared him to Michael Jackson. In various interviews Sandusky describes himself as a kid who never grew up. Michael Jackson is definitely a Peter Pan. They both LOVED kids with all their heart and seemed like they would never hurt a fly and I think both of them lived in denial and believe(d) the lies they tell/told.
Anonymous
11/15/2011 11:16
Subject: Sandusky interview
Anonymous wrote:Listening to the interview left me with an even stronger impression of his guilt. I got the impression he is arrogant enough to think that if he says it's not true, people will believe him. That he is cunning enough to squirm out of this mess. Creepy.
I felt exactly the same way!