Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love our neighborhood's quiet streets and convenient physical location (we're renting). But I know there are further-out, less convenient locations where I'd fit in better socially (more alternative, more international, more diverse). I think if my husband and I didn't have kids we would definitely look to buy where we are now, since our social life doesn't have to revolve around our neighborhood. However, I think about my kids and the friends they will make through school.
Is it better to be in a great location and be clinging to the bottom of the social ladder (here we'd be lucky to find something we could afford, and then it'd be a stretch for us), or to be in a neighborhood we can afford without such a stretch and where we might find more like-minded families. I do want my children to "fit in" and not feel like outcasts. I also am not very patient with them having playdates when I find the other kids spoiled and rude, and I'm finding that here. I know I'll get in trouble for saying that... I guess I'm just not good with kids. But I am sure there must be lower-key families like ours in this neighborhood too, and it could just take time to fit in.
If we stay in the great-location neighborhood, the investment in our home will be more secure.
What does "more alternative" mean?
Are you saying your street is WASPY and J Crew? Dig a little deeper. I live in one of these neighborhoods and am a pretty radical thinker.
You might be radical but you have to admit that there are entire neighborhoods in this city that are predominantly "waspy and Jcrew". It's easier said than done to meet the 1/10 or 1/15 families who are down-to-earth or "radical". If you know how to find them in the midst of a predominantly very different culture, please let me know! It often comes down to luck--who you happen to buy a house next to, who your kids befriend at school, who ends up in your kid's section of soccer. When 90% (or whatever) of the culture is one way it's just chance that you are given a chance to connect with the fraction who aren't.
Yeah, your views on this will change in a hurry when dc are in school. I was all for diversity until Jalonte from the Hood started explaining to dd in first grade how people get arrested and smoke crack pipes.
Anonymous wrote:Do any of the posters saying "Location, location, location" actually live in a neighborhood where they don't fit in socially or socio-economically? (aside from the Cleveland Park poster who found that she didn't and chose to move)?
It's easy to say "location, location, location" until you're stuck in a neighborhood where you have very little in common with 90% your neighbors.
We live in one (beautiful house in upper NW DC which we afforded due to a combination of factors) and we often wish we had moved to Silver Spring, Takoma Park, etc instead. We have a decent enough income but we don't have the same lifestyles as any of our neighbors. I SAH but I don't have a full time nanny. I don't have a vacation home. I don't drive a luxury SUV. I don't wear all Patagonia. etc. etc. etc. People are nice but we are very different and I really wish we were surrounded by a different (more international, more middle class) community. I had no idea this would matter when I was buying a house and hadn't been in this situation. I would have said "location" as well and I did--evidenced by where we bought our house.
We do have social circles and friends all over the city but I wish we had them next door.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love our neighborhood's quiet streets and convenient physical location (we're renting). But I know there are further-out, less convenient locations where I'd fit in better socially (more alternative, more international, more diverse). I think if my husband and I didn't have kids we would definitely look to buy where we are now, since our social life doesn't have to revolve around our neighborhood. However, I think about my kids and the friends they will make through school.
Is it better to be in a great location and be clinging to the bottom of the social ladder (here we'd be lucky to find something we could afford, and then it'd be a stretch for us), or to be in a neighborhood we can afford without such a stretch and where we might find more like-minded families. I do want my children to "fit in" and not feel like outcasts. I also am not very patient with them having playdates when I find the other kids spoiled and rude, and I'm finding that here. I know I'll get in trouble for saying that... I guess I'm just not good with kids. But I am sure there must be lower-key families like ours in this neighborhood too, and it could just take time to fit in.
If we stay in the great-location neighborhood, the investment in our home will be more secure.
What does "more alternative" mean?
Are you saying your street is WASPY and J Crew? Dig a little deeper. I live in one of these neighborhoods and am a pretty radical thinker.
so the only options in this area wasp or 'hood?
You might be radical but you have to admit that there are entire neighborhoods in this city that are predominantly "waspy and Jcrew". It's easier said than done to meet the 1/10 or 1/15 families who are down-to-earth or "radical". If you know how to find them in the midst of a predominantly very different culture, please let me know! It often comes down to luck--who you happen to buy a house next to, who your kids befriend at school, who ends up in your kid's section of soccer. When 90% (or whatever) of the culture is one way it's just chance that you are given a chance to connect with the fraction who aren't.
Yeah, your views on this will change in a hurry when dc are in school. I was all for diversity until Jalonte from the Hood started explaining to dd in first grade how people get arrested and smoke crack pipes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love our neighborhood's quiet streets and convenient physical location (we're renting). But I know there are further-out, less convenient locations where I'd fit in better socially (more alternative, more international, more diverse). I think if my husband and I didn't have kids we would definitely look to buy where we are now, since our social life doesn't have to revolve around our neighborhood. However, I think about my kids and the friends they will make through school.
Is it better to be in a great location and be clinging to the bottom of the social ladder (here we'd be lucky to find something we could afford, and then it'd be a stretch for us), or to be in a neighborhood we can afford without such a stretch and where we might find more like-minded families. I do want my children to "fit in" and not feel like outcasts. I also am not very patient with them having playdates when I find the other kids spoiled and rude, and I'm finding that here. I know I'll get in trouble for saying that... I guess I'm just not good with kids. But I am sure there must be lower-key families like ours in this neighborhood too, and it could just take time to fit in.
If we stay in the great-location neighborhood, the investment in our home will be more secure.
What does "more alternative" mean?
Are you saying your street is WASPY and J Crew? Dig a little deeper. I live in one of these neighborhoods and am a pretty radical thinker.
You might be radical but you have to admit that there are entire neighborhoods in this city that are predominantly "waspy and Jcrew". It's easier said than done to meet the 1/10 or 1/15 families who are down-to-earth or "radical". If you know how to find them in the midst of a predominantly very different culture, please let me know! It often comes down to luck--who you happen to buy a house next to, who your kids befriend at school, who ends up in your kid's section of soccer. When 90% (or whatever) of the culture is one way it's just chance that you are given a chance to connect with the fraction who aren't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love our neighborhood's quiet streets and convenient physical location (we're renting). But I know there are further-out, less convenient locations where I'd fit in better socially (more alternative, more international, more diverse). I think if my husband and I didn't have kids we would definitely look to buy where we are now, since our social life doesn't have to revolve around our neighborhood. However, I think about my kids and the friends they will make through school.
Is it better to be in a great location and be clinging to the bottom of the social ladder (here we'd be lucky to find something we could afford, and then it'd be a stretch for us), or to be in a neighborhood we can afford without such a stretch and where we might find more like-minded families. I do want my children to "fit in" and not feel like outcasts. I also am not very patient with them having playdates when I find the other kids spoiled and rude, and I'm finding that here. I know I'll get in trouble for saying that... I guess I'm just not good with kids. But I am sure there must be lower-key families like ours in this neighborhood too, and it could just take time to fit in.
If we stay in the great-location neighborhood, the investment in our home will be more secure.
What does "more alternative" mean?
Are you saying your street is WASPY and J Crew? Dig a little deeper. I live in one of these neighborhoods and am a pretty radical thinker.
Anonymous wrote:OP, my DH and I were in your shoes until a few months ago. we were renting a SFH in Cleveland Park and loved the location. The smallest house on our block went up for sale, and we were really considering it. Loved the location, could walk to the Zoo, right off the red line -- but felt we didn't "fit in" with our neighbors (and FWIW, our HHI is $250k).
We ended up buying in Takoma Park, for a myriad of reasons, but mostly because it felt like "home" from the first time we stepped foot in the neighborhood. Our neighbors have been nothing but over-the-top in welcoming us to our new home. We had an old couple across the street MAIL us a "congratulations on your new house" card, with recommendations to local community centers and churches of all types of denominations. We've met more families at the park than we did in 2 years of renting in our old house. And yes, it it no Cleveland Park or Dupont, but our house is in walking distance to a few restaurants and the farmers market. Our commute isn't great - TP is tucked away! - but for our family, we made the right decision. Good luck to you!
Anonymous wrote:I love our neighborhood's quiet streets and convenient physical location (we're renting). But I know there are further-out, less convenient locations where I'd fit in better socially (more alternative, more international, more diverse). I think if my husband and I didn't have kids we would definitely look to buy where we are now, since our social life doesn't have to revolve around our neighborhood. However, I think about my kids and the friends they will make through school.
Is it better to be in a great location and be clinging to the bottom of the social ladder (here we'd be lucky to find something we could afford, and then it'd be a stretch for us), or to be in a neighborhood we can afford without such a stretch and where we might find more like-minded families. I do want my children to "fit in" and not feel like outcasts. I also am not very patient with them having playdates when I find the other kids spoiled and rude, and I'm finding that here. I know I'll get in trouble for saying that... I guess I'm just not good with kids. But I am sure there must be lower-key families like ours in this neighborhood too, and it could just take time to fit in.
If we stay in the great-location neighborhood, the investment in our home will be more secure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, my DH and I were in your shoes until a few months ago. we were renting a SFH in Cleveland Park and loved the location. The smallest house on our block went up for sale, and we were really considering it. Loved the location, could walk to the Zoo, right off the red line -- but felt we didn't "fit in" with our neighbors (and FWIW, our HHI is $250k).
We ended up buying in Takoma Park, for a myriad of reasons, but mostly because it felt like "home" from the first time we stepped foot in the neighborhood. Our neighbors have been nothing but over-the-top in welcoming us to our new home. We had an old couple across the street MAIL us a "congratulations on your new house" card, with recommendations to local community centers and churches of all types of denominations. We've met more families at the park than we did in 2 years of renting in our old house. And yes, it it no Cleveland Park or Dupont, but our house is in walking distance to a few restaurants and the farmers market. Our commute isn't great - TP is tucked away! - but for our family, we made the right decision. Good luck to you!
Please elaborate. Why didn't you "fit in" in CP? It seems to be just as liberal as Takoma Park.
Anonymous wrote:OP, my DH and I were in your shoes until a few months ago. we were renting a SFH in Cleveland Park and loved the location. The smallest house on our block went up for sale, and we were really considering it. Loved the location, could walk to the Zoo, right off the red line -- but felt we didn't "fit in" with our neighbors (and FWIW, our HHI is $250k).
We ended up buying in Takoma Park, for a myriad of reasons, but mostly because it felt like "home" from the first time we stepped foot in the neighborhood. Our neighbors have been nothing but over-the-top in welcoming us to our new home. We had an old couple across the street MAIL us a "congratulations on your new house" card, with recommendations to local community centers and churches of all types of denominations. We've met more families at the park than we did in 2 years of renting in our old house. And yes, it it no Cleveland Park or Dupont, but our house is in walking distance to a few restaurants and the farmers market. Our commute isn't great - TP is tucked away! - but for our family, we made the right decision. Good luck to you!