Anonymous wrote:just because there are idiots who get married doesn't mean we let two men get married to each other. how is that connected?
Anonymous wrote:Kim kardashian's marriage shouldn't have gone through because her huge ass didn't agree
FYI I don't care about gay marriage but if you put all gays on an island they wouldn't be able to reproduce and thus by darwin's law go extinct. (just like kardashian's ass)
Anonymous wrote:I think OP's point is that straights are doing a plenty good job of demeaning the institution of marriage on their own.
Why would a few gays that want to marry be any worse?
@14:03, so does the existence of men and women who marry not intending or wanting to have kids offend you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kim kardashian's marriage shouldn't have gone through because her huge ass didn't agree
FYI I don't care about gay marriage but if you put all gays on an island they wouldn't be able to reproduce and thus by darwin's law go extinct. (just like kardashian's ass)
Except that the straight people would keep giving birth to gay people. You're an idot. How exactly did you think the gay people got here in the first place?
Anonymous wrote:Kim kardashian's marriage shouldn't have gone through because her huge ass didn't agree
FYI I don't care about gay marriage but if you put all gays on an island they wouldn't be able to reproduce and thus by darwin's law go extinct. (just like kardashian's ass)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree, this is a lame analogy. For the people who are anti-gay marriage (not me), it's about "condoning" a particular way to have sex. Anyway, the Kardashians are a joke and not a model of anything.
Actually the Supreme Court has already done that part, almost a decade ago. Lawrence v. Texas 6-3 opinion.
You know what I meant ...![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree, this is a lame analogy. For the people who are anti-gay marriage (not me), it's about "condoning" a particular way to have sex. Anyway, the Kardashians are a joke and not a model of anything.
Actually the Supreme Court has already done that part, almost a decade ago. Lawrence v. Texas 6-3 opinion.
Anonymous wrote:I agree, this is a lame analogy. For the people who are anti-gay marriage (not me), it's about "condoning" a particular way to have sex. Anyway, the Kardashians are a joke and not a model of anything.